User talk:Basateen

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Raya.sharbain! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marek.69^talk 12:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	For your plans to try and get Wikipedia and University College London working together, you get this barnstar and the gratitude of Jeremy Bentham for increasing global net utility. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! This is awesome! :)
Flycatchr 14:39, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	For your tireless work in helping me get WMUK's efforts around Campus Ambassadors off the ground, especially the UK's first Campus Ambassadors Workshop at University College London on Friday 12 September 2014. Thank you! -- ToniSant (talk) 16:07, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Toni! This is wonderful, I really appreciate it :) --Raya - Get in touch! 15:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

25th Oct ballet editathon

Hi Raya, nice to meet you today. The Ballet editathon at the Royal Opera House is on the 25th - be great to see you there, feel free to bring a friend. Ϣere SpielChequers 16:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there :) Thank you for letting me know! This looks great! --Raya - Get in touch! 13:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Education Program:University College London/MSIN1003 Information World (Autumn 2015)

Can you please contact whoever is in charge of this course and get them to tell their students that articles aren't essays and not to edit war? Example. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let the students know, thank you. --Raya - Get in touch! 18:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI another example, leading to this problematic request at Mean as custard's talk page. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: I'll get in touch with the student... Apologies for this... --Flycatchr 13:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply and for being on top of things. I know these things happen with student assignments sometimes. I'm not sure if it's articulated in class, but I find it helps to make it clear to everyone that grades aren't based on what "sticks" in the article (i.e. what remains at the end of the course/assignment) -- that their work is visible in the page history, so there's no need to try to force things :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: Actually, the assignment is set in a way that what sticks on the article is what matters most... Which is evidently not good/ideal for a Wikipedia assignment and which explains students' stress. I am going to talk to the organisers of the module to see how we can structure the assignment differently for next year, taking into consideration your contributions and @NeilN:'s contributions.

Indeed. It's an aspect of assignments that tends to cause conflicts with other editors (being contrary to Wikipedia's collaborative spirit). If you haven't come across it, you might be interested to check out some of the information (e.g. brochures, training) at the Wiki Education Foundation website (I work for them). We're only able to support classes in the US and Canada right now, but the materials are applicable to anyone working on the English Wikipedia. PS: You're pinging Mean as custard, but seem to be responding to me, User:Rhododendrites :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: Apologies for pinging Mean as custard this entire time (got a bit confused there) and for not replying earlier... I have actually gone through a less formal Campus Ambassador training last year and am aware of the brilliant work you do at the Wiki Ed Foundation. The problem in my case is the module leader himself is not familiar with the dynamics of Wiki platforms and community and wasn't too keen on evaluating students on collaboration. I'm only a student and didn't have much authority over how the assignment should have been run or graded.--Flycatchr 12:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:YueHe is on the verge of being indef'ed for long-term/repeated copyvio. If "what sticks is what matters", you might recommend to him that he thinks very hard about what it would mean that all of his edits are undone and he is prohibited from making any more. Not sure what training the students received in this aspect of WP contribution, and this editor in particular has a history pre-dating this course, but I often see this sort of problem arise when students' prime directive sounds like "get something, anything, on there". DMacks (talk) 02:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vixtoria and User:Amna Kashif were the next two I spot-checked from the course-page, and both were copyvio'ing. What a mess; I'm too tired to look further. But hopefully the instructor takes note, both for grading appropriately this time and for working to avoid it next time. DMacks (talk) 03:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I warned User:AndrejKoc for edit-warring (unexplained undoing of my explained edits), but his edits (and redoings thereof) include multiple violations of policy and guideline (the topic itself isn't my specialty; no comment on the general editorial/content aspect). DMacks (talk) 04:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's make a flyer

woot! That'd be great :) Cool - I'll work on the text and get back to you! Lirazelf (talk) 10:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Al-Moeini

I took your redlinked AFD nomination at Mohammed Al-Moeini and completed the steps to list it at AFD. The debate may be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Al-Moeini. However, since then there seems to be a consensus that the subject is a notable footballer. He has played for multiple pro teams in a fully pro league. If you don't object, we can go ahead and close the debate. Since the nomination started with your tag on the article, the decision to withdraw is yours. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ultraexactzz: I would like to object. Although you state that the footballer is notable, I can't seem to find any external sources linking to him. --Flycatchr 15:07, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the debate was already closed as Keep. If the team they played for is a fully professional team (which they are), then the player is considered notable. Now, if there isn't actually any evidence that they did indeed play on the teams they're shown to have played for, then yes deletion might be appropriate. So your best bet is going to be checking the teams listed and seeing if this player is listed on their rosters for the years he was with that club. If he's missing from the official lists, then let me know and we'll see how to proceed. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the debate, This link to the Soccerway database seems to confirm that this player was on notable teams. It's not much, but is probably enough to confirm notability under WP:NFOOTY. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then I think in this case the name of the player is wrong on the WP article. By comparing height/weight/DOB details in the current WP page with external pages like this one, and this one, I get Mohamed Ali Abdulla. --Flycatchr 00:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest raising that issue at WT:FOOTY, then. The editors at the Football wikiproject are more familiar with international soccer than I am, and should be able to help you out. Changing the article to reflect a correct name is simple - because whoever this player is, they did play on pro teams. So they get an article. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 18:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Flycatchr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Flycatchr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Courses Modules are being deprecated

Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Event coordinator granted

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 13:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Angela Glendenning for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angela Glendenning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Glendenning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:08, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

Thank you for the training. 13:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuizaDantas1 (talk • contribs)

Hello! Very happy to have participated in it. Flycatchr 20:31, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Jordanian protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Abdullah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Razzaz

The source is used in article.. Also support the article's nomination here [1]. Makeandtoss (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Flycatchr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Worldwide Tribe

Hello, Flycatchr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Worldwide Tribe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:35, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Event coordinator granted

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have temporarily enabled the flag on your account until 2019-03-09. Keep in mind these things:

The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:39, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dead Sea Flash Floods 2018

Hello, Flycatchr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Dead Sea Flash Floods 2018.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC helper

Hi Flycatchr. If you're interested in reviewing AfC drafts (e.g. [2]), it's a good idea to use the AFC helper script to automate the process of removing the templates/categories/etc. You can find more information at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions. – Joe (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe: Thanks! Will check this out :-) Flycatchr 09:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed El-Kurd

مرحبًا كيفك؟ بخصوص مقالة محمد الكرد تذكّر أن ويكيبيديا ليست جمع للمصادر ونسخ ولصق فقط هناك مصادر موثوقة يمكنك الاستشهاد بها وباقي الكلام لاداعي له المقالة هي مناسبة والمصادر كذلك تكفي انظر Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources

--Aliaboomar (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aliaboomar: مراحب وشكرا للرسالة، انا اخالف الرأي فجميع المصادر التي استخدمت في المقال تعتبر مصادر موثوقة حسب هذه القائمة

وجميع المصادر ايضا استخدمت في مكانها :-)

السؤال يطرح نفسه: لماذا يقوم المرشح لحذف المقالة بإزالة المراجع؟

Flycatchr 16:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Burhan Karkutli moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Burhan Karkutli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Burhan Karkutli

Hello, Flycatchr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Burhan Karkutli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Burhan Karkutli

Hello, Flycatchr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Burhan Karkutli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]