User talk:Raw4815

Welcome!

Hello, Raw4815, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Dwight Eisenhower

Ryan, you're off to a good start on your first article, but you need to know that you cannot use other Wikipedia articles as the sole sources for your own article. Wikipedia is not "self-referencing." In other words, the Dwight Eisenhower article is not a valid source for this article. You need to use references from other reliable sources. The welcome message above has some good links you might want to check out on writing Wikipedia articles. If you need help, put a {{helpme}} tag on your article or talk page, and an editor will respond in fairly short order. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:01, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dwight Eisenhower's Rolex Watch

The article Dwight Eisenhower's Rolex Watch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable watch.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 19:57, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dwight Eisenhower's Rolex Watch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dwight Eisenhower's Rolex Watch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwight Eisenhower's Rolex Watch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ttonyb (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dwight eisenhower world war II jacket for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dwight eisenhower world war II jacket is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwight eisenhower world war II jacket until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ttonyb (talk) 17:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A concern

It appears that you are posting items which are a part of the Raleigh Amyx collection, with the only references in these articles being to his web site. Seeing as how Me. Amyx sells some of these items on eBay, and apparently this collection is part of his business, there is a concern that these Wikipedia articles may be used to promote Mr. Amyx's interests. Please be advised that Wikipedia prohibits promotion of any kind, as set for on this page. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Raw4815. You have new messages at Ttonyb1's talk page.
Message added 18:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

There was once a time when Mr. Amyx's collection was too small to merit notability or notoriety, but that has changed since the addition of, among others, the White House China and the Olympic Memorabilia, both of which now are recognized as being one of the finest and most valuable in the world (see the Raleigh DeGeer Amyx wikipedia page). I should mention that prior to the decision to create wikipedia articles, it was asked of all interested parties which items he has in his collection that are of great historical significance, particularly from the world of collecting AS a historical practice and a form of preservation, NOT AS a form of advertising, marketing, or selling. Were I sly and subtle enough, I'm sure I could create some promotional pages meant merely to raise the visibility of his items for selling purposes. But the reality is that there are a few items of great historical significance, primarily from a collector's perspective (particularly one of americana), a few of which are already attested to in third-party sources outside of wikipedia or Mr. Amyx's website. The primary trouble I'm having is with synthesizing and contextualizing the content into a complete whole, and then with the formatting and layout of the page. There are also some copyrighted photos that are critical in exhibiting the items, and I want to make sure I follow wikipedia's guidelines on using copyrighted photos that I have been given permission to use on the pages I create. Raw4815 (talk) 19:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:40, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Raw4815. You have new messages at Realkyhick's talk page.
Message added 22:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Raleigh-degeer-amyx-3.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Raleigh-degeer-amyx-3.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.americanheritage1.com/. As a copyright violation, File:Raleigh-degeer-amyx-3.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Raleigh-degeer-amyx-3.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Raleigh-degeer-amyx-3.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Raleigh-degeer-amyx-3.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Raleigh-degeer-amyx-3.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus 21:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

User:Ttonyb1 tagged your images with the wrong tag so I have corrected the confusion and also replaced his warnings above with the appropriate one. First off, you should let your files be deleted and reupload your images at Wikicommons. This has the advantage of allowing your images to be viewed on all Wikimedia projects.

You can either ask that the American Heritage webmaster place a note on each image saying that the image is licensed as CC By-SA 3.0 or you can ask for permission from the using the process at Commons:OTRS. If you already have email permission that meets the rigorous requirements at OTRS you can just mail it in to an OTRS volunteer.

Hopefully that answers your question. Marcus Qwertyus 21:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another talkback

Hello, Raw4815. You have new messages at Lifebaka's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

May 2011

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Raleigh DeGeer Amyx, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ttonyb (talk) 01:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Raleigh DeGeer Amyx, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. ttonyb (talk) 01:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Raleigh DeGeer Amyx. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --DAJF (talk) 02:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

COI and Raleigh DeGeer Amyx

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ttonyb (talk) 02:04, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raw4815 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 20:59, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]