Jump to content

User talk:Ravishankar9853

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ravishankar9853, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sapna tanveer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DanielRigal (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sapna tanveer

[edit]

The article Sapna tanveer has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DanielRigal (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

[edit]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Sapna Tanveer. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons prods without addressing the issue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons prods without addressing the issue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:FREE ENTRY.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 17:37, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sapna Tanveer for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sapna Tanveer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sapna Tanveer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe deckertalk to me 18:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kanti Shah.jpeg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Kanti Shah.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 19:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FREE ENTRY.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:FREE ENTRY.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 19:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anirudh chawla for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anirudh chawla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anirudh chawla until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LongLiveMusic (talk) 05:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Anirudh Chawla now.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Anirudh Chawla now.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Abhishek  Talk 14:49, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload media files with false or lacking copyright and source information, you may be blocked from editing. Please make sure you have read and understood our image use policy before making any further uploads. If you have questions, ask at the copyright question page. — Abhishek  Talk 14:52, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information, as you did at File:Sapna tanveer now.jpg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. . Phil Bridger (talk) 08:09, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Silk Smitha has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Trusilver 20:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Neha nair in grey T-Shirt.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://nehabhabhi.blogspot.com/search/label/Images%20Gallerys. As a copyright violation, File:Neha nair in grey T-Shirt.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Neha nair in grey T-Shirt.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:15, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated violations of Wikipedia's copyright policies. You have been warned repeatedly that your edits do not comply with policy, yet despite requests to desist you continue to upload non-free images. If in the future you would like to contribute productively to Wikipedia you can request that your account be unblocked. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:39, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ravishankar9853 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello admin,i am so proud to have member of Wikipedia,and i really you like the place and decide to stay here for too long or lifetime.Dear admin unfortunately i am blocked because of violating the policies but i think block is wrong because the information i putted was totally correct although it has a quit less informative. Therefore the blocking reason does not apply to my case.I promise to help by creating good articles and editing in well manner.Meanwhile i am apologizing that i will not do it again and i will strongly follow all the Wikipedia policies and guidelines.Thank you.Ravishankar9853 (talk) 19:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So you're sorry for what you did and yet you say you don't think you did anything wrong? This has nothing to do with whether or not the content you added was correct, its because it was copied from other sources without proper permission, i.e. a copyright violation Jac16888 Talk 19:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason for you block is given here - and copied below. I think you should read that first, before starting any new unblock request. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:19, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has persistently uploaded copyright violating images (I can't give diffs because they have been deleted), has repeatedly been warned, and has continued today. I think a block is in order. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked indef. The repeated copyvios, combined with zero communication or attempts to address the concerns expressed regarding their editing, do not instill any faith that a time-specific block will be effective. Should Ravishankar9853 have a change of heart and decide to edit constructively and within policy, they can request an unblock. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ravishankar9853 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello admin,i really like the Wikipedia place and i want to stay here for lifetime. Dear i am blocked because of violating the policies and ignored the warnings.I truthfully promise to won't be editing without having good knowledge of existing article. i read article how to create our first article. Now onwards i will follow the steps in true manner. i apologize and promise that all the policies and terms will never be broken like this again. i will definitely keep in mind all the Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Thank you Ravishankar9853 (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While you may be sincere in your desire to contribute constructively, your request gives no indication that you actually understand how to do that, or what the specific reasons for your block are, despite them being posted right here on this page. Twice. If you could post a request that is specific to your situation as opposed to a vague promises like the ones in your last request that would be helpful to your cause. As it stands now it appears you may not be quite ready to contribute productively here Beeblebrox (talk) 22:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ravishankar9853&oldid=1139440394"