User talk:Ravinesh rds

July 2020

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Sex organ, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Lumos3, one of the many editors here. I see you've made some changes to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.Let me point out that when deleting material it is customary to explain your motivation in the talk page of the article. Lumos3 (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Bikini waxing. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 10:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Minor" edits

Hi! You marked many of the edits you made today (2020-07-11) as "minor". Unfortunately, none of the edits appear to fit the Wikipedia criteria for Minor revisions, specifically (from WP:MINOR):

A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism. A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. An edit of this kind is marked in its page's revision history with a lower case, bolded "m" character (m).
By contrast, a major edit is one that should be reviewed for its acceptability to all concerned editors. Any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it concerns a single word; for example, the addition or removal of "not" is not a minor edit.

As you can see, many editors did not agree with your changes, and they have been reverted (changed back to the way they appeared before your edits), which is a pretty good sign they were not "minor".

I hope you'll stay here and contribute, but remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and is not censored (see WP:NOTCENSORED). If you run across something you find distasteful, the correct thing to do is look somewhere else. Cheers! — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 11:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. DMacks (talk) 12:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect your time here is about to end. Wikipedia is not going to bend to anyone's cultural whims or what you personally find "negative". DMacks (talk) 12:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nudity and protest. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your post at Wikipedia talk:Administrators

In regard to this complaint, may I suggest you properly monitor your own children and use of the internet, instead of campaigning for censorship of things you find objectionable, like bikini waxing apparently, N.J.A. | talk 13:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Don't change other people's posts as you did here. It's very disruptive. How would you like it if somebody removed part of your post? Bishonen | tålk 04:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]