User talk:Ravinder Singh Rautela
Redirects
[edit]Hello, please stop changing articles into redirects without discussion. If there was a discussion, please let me know, as I can't find it. AkiyamaKana (talk) 12:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- There is distinct lack of credible sources for “Rajput” in Nepal, Also in the controversial proclamation by Sher singh rana of excavating and bring back remains of Prithviraj Chauhan were proved invalid by Government of India ( Archeological Survey of India) after detail DNA analysis. Ravinder Singh Rautela (talk) 12:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @AkiyamaKana: they're a sock, see. Ratnahastin (talk) 12:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know they might be a sock. I thought what they were doing was quite suspicious. AkiyamaKana (talk) 12:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @AkiyamaKanaBrother, this user @Ratnahastin makes wrong edits and removes and redirects good valuable pages. You should also see that no one is listening to me because I am a small user. Before taking any action, look at @Ratnahastin edits and redirects which are more against a particular community. Ravinder Singh Rautela (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know they might be a sock. I thought what they were doing was quite suspicious. AkiyamaKana (talk) 12:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Anujror per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anujror. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Izno (talk) 17:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.