User talk:Raveonpraghga

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from SqueakBox! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:

Again, welcome, SqueakBox 20:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

American

Welcome to Wikipedia. We encourage everyone to participate, but Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and edits need to reflect a neutral point of view. Cheers, Wily D 21:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a democracy, please don't mistake it for one. Consensus is a nebulous concept, but it is how we run things. That said, if you have concerns, try making your case on the talk page. I'll warn you ahead of time that you have very little chance of succeeding here, because you're trying to include article-style information on a disambiguation page, which just isn't the right place for it. The issue you're trying to address is discussed to death in a few articles, but where you're looking to include it is just the wrong place. On a more personal note, that the edit you keep trying to introduce strongly supports a POV, rather than addressing the issue neutrally is problematic. The additional issue that it's at odds with every reliable souce on the subject is even more problematic. Wily D 23:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World's largest cities

This article is already sourced, every entry in it builds on the report of the UN. In order for a list of this kind to be meaningful, the same source has to be used for every city. A list where individual sources are used is not only less reliable, it has also been shown already that it leads to chauvinism when users try to find sources enlarging their own city, much as you are doing now when you are trying it with Guadalajara. This matter has already been discussed for quite some time and it was agreed that it's necessary to have a single, neutral source for all the entries. That is what we have now, and the introduction to the article clearly states that it builds on the UN data. Individual sources for individual cities will be erased. JdeJ 07:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Descartes a Kant

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Descartes a Kant, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Descartes a Kant seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Descartes a Kant, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why your bias against Monterrey??

First of all Robert, I would like to tell you I dont have absolutely nothing against your city, Guadalajara, but without hesitation, you have a incredibly bias against my city, Monterrey !! Why do you always try to hide all the facts that puts Monterrey ABOVE Guadalajara? Why so this bias against all the regiomontane culture??? Try to understand Monterrey has OVERPASS Guadalajara in almost all aspects, do not get blind against that. Monterrey is the industrial center of Mexico, the most important financial center (Until I know, you dont have an own bank in you city, as we with Banorte), the most educated city in Mexico and a very long etc. Even Guadalajara is most important by the cultural side, this is not a really sense if we try to determinate which city is most important for the whole country. Finally I found this endless discussion is futile, so it represent a mutual lack of respect for the people of both cities. I invite you to have a friendly (I am not kidding) dialogue with me, here's my email if you want to discuss this issue

Ing. E. Guerra Monterrey, N.L. iqega1972@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.212.213.40 (talk) 02:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

misunderstanding

I, for some reason, thought you had stuck the information about Guadalajara's name in the sports section. I realize now that you modified the lead. I thought that info was already in the lead.Thelmadatter (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Slide Effect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Slide Effect

The article The Slide Effect has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability - an advert?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 04:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guadalajara 2020

The article Guadalajara 2020 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable initiative.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sussie 4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sussie 4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sussie 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]