User talk:RatsnakeVS
RatsnakeVS, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]Hi RatsnakeVS!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Stats
[edit]Hi. When you update stats in infoboxes, and on other places, please remember to update the entire infobox including the timestamp. After edits like this, the bottom of infobox stated All statistics correct as of 20 August 2016. when you obviously added matches after that. Also flags should not be added like you did in this edit. Qed237 (talk) 10:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
January 2018
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Grant McCann, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 06:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RatsnakeVS. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FireworkPowder (talk) 19:25, 19 April 2019 (UTC)