User talk:Ratn9ne

Talkback

Hello, Ratn9ne. You have new messages at WP:FEED#http:.2F.2Fen.wikipedia.org.2Fwiki.2FL.K._Samuels.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I replied to your request for feedback. I hope my suggestions are useful! Chevy monte carlo 08:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Doctrine of Fascism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

authorized 1933 translation of “The Political and Social Doctrine of Fascism” by Benito Mussolini. (Benito Mussolini, “The Political and Social Doctrine of Fascism,” first authorized translation into

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ratn9ne. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article L.K. Samuels, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at L.K. Samuels, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 04:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Future of Freedom Conference has been accepted

The Future of Freedom Conference, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of L. K. Samuels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L. K. Samuels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. K. Samuels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@[|Sounds like political censorship Beyond My Ken|]@ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.36.120.173 (talk) 22:32, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, but, actually, I've withdrawn the nomination for other reasons. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Souce? 47.36.120.173 (talk) 22:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you meant "source", source for what, my withdrawal? Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:53, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]