User talk:Ratmrulez

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lorna Fitzgerald, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 00:22, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lorna Fitzgerald. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 00:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lorna Fitzgerald, you will be blocked from editing. 5 albert square (talk) 00:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Lorna Fitzgerald. Manway (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I do not see whats wrong with what I wrote Ratmrulez (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not encyclopedic, it's your own personal opinion and it doesn't belong on her page --5 albert square (talk) 00:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe what you are adding to the article is vandalism but it is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. This appears to be you personal opionion. Also you might want to take note of the three revert rule. You have reverted three times already and if you revert again that can be blocked for edit warring. please go to the talk page and discuss this rather than reverting edits. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 00:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lorna Fitzgerald. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. 5 albert square (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in one week. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Malinaccier (talk) 00:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked the user indefinitely because he is blatantly a sockpuppet of User:Ln of x. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 01:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]