User talk:Ratherbe2000

Welcome!

Hello, Ratherbe2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:17, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

... for your work on RPDR contestants! Happy editing. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:39, 18 February 2018 (UTC) BTW, I created stubs for Thorgy Thor and Aja, if you're interested in helping to expand. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed there used to be an article for Tatianna, but the page was redirected. Do you happen to know if there's a lot more sourcing to expand this article? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 02:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thorgy Thor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rocky Horror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please reverse order...

Please create the page in mainspace and then add the links to the new page. Note, I do love your expansion. Not sure *all* the queens on RPDR are notable enough, but I'm willing to be convinced by your articles.Naraht (talk) 19:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inline citation placement

Hey there! Thanks again for your contributions to Wikipedia (I mostly see your work on DRDR-related articles). Just a friendly reminder, inline citations/sourcing information go on the outside of commas, periods, parentheses, etc., so please add them after punctuation. Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monet X Change, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Including the accent mark

Please see the discussion at Talk:Monet X Change on whether we should include the accent mark in her name.Naraht (talk) 13:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blair St. Clair

FYI, the Blair St. Clair article has been redirected. You may be interested in weight in here: Talk:Blair_St._Clair#Notability. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The article has been restored, so never mind. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Balenciaga

I changed the redirect of Mariah Balenciaga to the artist from the season.Naraht (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANTBF Podcast Logo.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your Talk Page Messages

Hey there! Just a friendly reminder to sign your messages in discussion places like the AfD discussion and on talk pages by clicking the signature button in the toolbar or placing ~~~~ (that's 4 tildes) at the end of your comments. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ratherbe2000. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need help?

I see that you have an article about Stacy Layne Matthews up for deletion. Can you think of any other reliable websites to use as sources? I really do want to help you with this. Mister saxobeatasap (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:02, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ratherbe2000. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 20:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:56, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ratherbe2000, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Linguist111^{my talk page} 03:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ratherbe2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23632 was submitted on Dec 21, 2018 23:35:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:35, 21 December 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ratherbe2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23719 was submitted on Jan 06, 2019 02:14:22. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ratherbe2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23723 was submitted on Jan 06, 2019 18:13:13. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ratherbe2000, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Linguist111^{my talk page} 17:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ratherbe2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25800 was submitted on Jul 04, 2019 04:06:57. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ratherbe2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25804 was submitted on Jul 04, 2019 13:32:57. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:32, 4 July 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ratherbe2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25809 was submitted on Jul 04, 2019 22:13:39. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Valentina Drag Queen.png

The file File:Valentina Drag Queen.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low-res image, there's a better one of her on Valentina (drag queen)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]