User talk:Raterr101

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Only Girl (In The World), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as ONLY GIRL IN THE WORLD, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:58, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Only Girl (In The World). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tom my! 23:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Happiness (Alexis Jordan song)

A tag has been placed on Happiness (Alexis Jordan song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dac04 (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Keyshia Cole, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Keyshia Cole was changed by Raterr101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.842732 on 2010-11-22T16:22:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BADCHARTS

Please do not add charts from hot100brasil.com, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 16:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jodie Oconnor (singer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jodie Oconnor (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Clubmarx (talk) 03:21, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Basic Instinct (album), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Pink Friday, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Yves (talk) 00:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste

Please do not copy and paste from other sources (as you did here), even if you do link to the site. You must rewrite it in your own words. See WP:Copy-paste. Thank you. —Mike Allen 07:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cherlise

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cherlise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé Knowles discography

Just a reminder, please don't use That Grape Juice to source certifications and sales because its not a reliable source. Oz ^talk 23:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Man Down

Why did you put a source in the peak position column of the charts section? And the reference is unformatted. I will fix your wrong doings. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 00:43, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Cherlise Discography

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Cherlise Discography. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Cherlise. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Cherlise - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Sean ^{(Ask Me?)} 00:06, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marvin Priest

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marvin Priest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 22:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of That's All Me for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article That's All Me is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's All Me until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 19:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven emmons

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Steven emmons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:11, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Cherlise-1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cherlise-1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to Here I Am (Kelly Rowland album), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 01:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Your addition to Love U Right has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 03:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for using anonymous edits to edit war. It appears that 89.240.227.3 is you, and that you are logging out to revert other editors and undo AFD results.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 00:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note to observers: the autoblock tripped, indicating that I was correct about the relationship here.—Kww(talk) 00:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Cherlise.png

Thanks for uploading File:Cherlise.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Cherlise-Love U Right-feat-Lil Wayne.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cherlise-Love U Right-feat-Lil Wayne.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks this time for the Mindless Behavior (group) article you created was so full of copyright violations, bad references, and falsehoods that it was either vandalism or severe incompetence. Your next block will be indefinite if this keeps up.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 21:50, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Rihanna discography. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nothing in the source you provided in your edit mentions a gold award in France for "Man Down". Why did you think the addition of gold was justified? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 22:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Final warning

If I see you removing references and providing contradictory data (as you did here) or adding completely unsourced data (as you did here) again, you will be blocked indefinitely. You've been around long enough to understand WP:V, and this talk page is getting insanely full of warnings.—Kww(talk) 23:58, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Beyoncé Knowles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Calvin • ^TalkThatTalk 01:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Beyonce Knowles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Calvin • ^TalkThatTalk 01:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Ian Cairns (talk) 01:50, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Ciara discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You know--or should know--that forums, self-published sites, etc., are unacceptable as sources. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 04:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for returning to edit warring and use of unreliable sources on Ciara discography. You at least used a source this time, so the block isn't indefinite. Consider this your final block, though: any return to use of forum posts and unsourced material will make the next block permanent.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 16:11, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for your immediate return to adding false material to articles such as Rihanna discography. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 01:18, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The New Classic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The New Classic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Classic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tgeairn (talk) 04:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The New Classic concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The New Classic, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The New Classic

Hello, Raterr101. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The New Classic".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]