User talk:RatatoskJones
Book of Abraham
[edit]Thanks for the catch on Book of Abraham - you are right, we mislabeled facsimile 3 - it should have been facsimile 2. I reverted back to your version. --Descartes1979 (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
The "sugar high" comment on the Book of Mormon discussion page is priceless. If laughing adds time to one's life, thanks for the extension. (Taivo (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)) Good job of pruning the links on the Book of Mormon page (Taivo (talk) 08:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC))
Motpol was not founded by Neo-nazi; that is slander and you shouldn't post slander. As for nyheteridag.se -- that news site is not fringe and not founded by extreme right. The whole of Sweden is extreme left, so anything even remotely right in Sweden would in context be considered "extreme right" over there. But by all means, if you have proof of your claims, post them -- otherwise I would advice that you remove your comment about these being founded by the extreme right and neo-nazi.--Thronedrei (talk) 06:38, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- See [1] for info on Motpol. Note the neonazi label in the very intro. As for Nyheteridag.se, it's founded and run by the same people who ran the racist site Avpixlat and its predecessor, and has close ties to far right racist party SD. See this for one of many sources: [2]. If you don't understand Swedish, I can translate for you. Claiming that the whole of Sweden is extreme left is delusional and completely unsupported. So no, I don't see any need to retract or apologize. Ratatosk Jones (talk) 16:48, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- No, sorry. According to WB rules wikipedia is NOT a reliable source. So you can't use what has been written on wikipedia to prove your case. Also, avpixlat is NOT racist. Again if you can actually provide evidence for your claims that is one thing, otherwise you need to remove your claims about these sites being racist/neo-nazi whatever. Also, SD is NOT a racist party... seriously, you don't seem to know anything about Sweden do you?--Thronedrei (talk) 13:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- I linked to a wikipedia article with multiple sources. Had I been writing an article about Motpol, that would not have been kosher (to use a word disagreeable to the motpol crowd), but I wasn't, so no problem. SD as a racist party might not be a universal view, but there are a lot of us Swedes who think so. That avpixlat is racist is an even more popular view, but my point was that it is a far right fringe source, like Nyheteridag.se. Now, if you have issues with my dismissal of your sources (and I note you have not supported anything) take it to WP:RSN. If you have an issue with what I write on my talkpage about SD or avpixlat, take it to WP:ANI. Otherwise, kindly stop posting here. I will delete it if you do. Ratatosk Jones (talk) 17:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- No, sorry. According to WB rules wikipedia is NOT a reliable source. So you can't use what has been written on wikipedia to prove your case. Also, avpixlat is NOT racist. Again if you can actually provide evidence for your claims that is one thing, otherwise you need to remove your claims about these sites being racist/neo-nazi whatever. Also, SD is NOT a racist party... seriously, you don't seem to know anything about Sweden do you?--Thronedrei (talk) 13:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 11:29, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Happy New Year, RatatoskJones!
[edit]
RatatoskJones,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
[edit]The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Racism in Italy". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 15 January 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 01:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
[edit]The request for formal mediation concerning Racism in Italy, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, RatatoskJones. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
RfA
[edit]
|
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
Sweden
[edit] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
David A (talk) 17:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RatatoskJones. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RatatoskJones. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)