User talk:Rashmash

Magnavox Odyssey

It seems you keep trying to re-add the same unreferenced material which violated WP:OR. Material added must conform to the guidelines and standards of Wikipedia, especially material with claims of this nature. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once again it appears you're following Disruptive Editing by ignoring the attempt at dialog and continuing to add in your WP:OR edits. As stated, material must conform tot he guidelines and standards of Wikipedia, especially with some of the broad unreferenced claims you're trying to add. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 00:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Obake no Q-tarō. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 18:52, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Obake no Q-tarō. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 00:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rashmash

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on User:Rashmash, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 07:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can ignore this warning. Your user page was used by a spammer. I have deleted your user page and blocked the spammer. Sorry about the trouble. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Rashmash. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Allen4names 04:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doraemon: Nobita and the Island of Miracles—Animal Adventure (video game)

The article Doraemon: Nobita and the Island of Miracles—Animal Adventure (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

game comes out at future date. no notability and no sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HotshotCleaner (talk) 01:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doraemon 2: SOS! Otogi no Kuni

The article Doraemon 2: SOS! Otogi no Kuni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Could not find find reliable sources, even after using WP:VG/S to attempt to salvage the page. The page appears abandoned and already has no sources.Also falls under lack of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]