User talk:Rashedhabtoor

hello

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rkhmedia/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Rkhmedia/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, Rkhmedia. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but User:Rkhmedia/sandbox has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD#G11 give the appearance of an editor violating Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too.

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community portal. There is help available at THE TEAHOUSE. Cheers, and happy editing. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:56, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:57, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rashedhabtoor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

rashedhabtoor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia team, Salutation of the day. I am sorry that I couldn't adhere the guidelines and policy of wikipedia. I am now willing to use the following new username : rashedhabtoor . Kindly release the block to use wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Per Dlohcierekim, below. The new username is fine, but you still need to address the other aspects of the block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The username is acceptable; alas, I have not received my renamer bit. ALso, this is the name of the person about whom you wrote ARTSPAM. This brings up WP:COI and WP:AUTO. Please read those. I will not decline the unblock on a block I made, but I don't know how others would feel about it. They may think it best if you not edit about yourself- though you might make suggestions. You have not addressed this promotional part of your block at all. Please describe areas other than yourself you wish to write about. If you only wish to write about yourself, they may suggest you choose alternative outlets to do so. Any other admin may do as they think best without further discussion. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You do not address the promotional aspect of your block. Do you understand that Wikipedia is not social media for people to tell the world about themselves, but an encyclopedia? Please review the links Dlohcierekim posted in their post. I am willing to consider your request, but I would ask if you would be willing to agree to not write about yourself, and tell us what you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 08:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have globally renamed User:Rkhmedia to User:Rashedhabtoor. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppetry

You are now also blocked as a sock account of User:Rashidalhabtoor. Your username is also not acceptable, as you admitted at User talk:Rashidalhabtoor that you are not Mr Al Habtoor himself (and when I did the rename I'd forgotten about the other account.) If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to request unblock at User talk:Rashidalhabtoor, following the instructions that you will find there.

Reviewing admins, please compare this with this Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm shocked!. Be still my palpitating heart.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dlohcierekim, Thanks for your help and suggestion to improve page edits in wikipedia. I would like to use different name but my account creation option is temporarily suspended. I won't use any name resemble to any existing personality in wikipedia. I will also not use a page for promotional purpose. Could you please not unblock my IP address to open a new account. thank

Dear Dlohcierekin , I wish to change the current user name rashedhabtoor to sunilchand

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rashedhabtoor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

sunilchand (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

due to many error from my side, I am not able to create new account. Please accept my request to create a new account now. thanks

Decline reason:

As stated below, you need to return to your original account and request to be unblocked. Since this account is established to be a sock, it will not be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make your unblock request at User talk:Rashidalhabtoor, and address the reasons that account is blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:54, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'll just add, in reply to "Could you please not unblock my IP address to open a new account", no. While your account is blocked, you are not allowed to create a new account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:07, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]