User talk:Rashed at Bilqas SC

Welcome!

Hello, Bilqas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! . Britishfinance (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

please remove the block from my account. Also I'm managing Belkas, so how I return to belkas instead of Rashed at Belqas "on behalf of".

Rashed at Bilqas SC (talk) 12:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Rashed Hammad[reply]

Mohamed Tolba moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mohamed Tolba, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 16:10, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Suliman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mohamed Suliman, does not have any sources and citations and so cannot remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved it to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest and username concerns

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Bilqas SC, and I noticed that your username, "Bilqas", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure of employment

Hello Rashed at Bilqas SC. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Bilqas SC, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rashed at Bilqas SC. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rashed at Bilqas SC|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drm310

I'm not paid for that.

I'm the digital marketing consultant of Bilqas sports club and i'm responsible for this page creation.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rashed at Bilqas SC (talk • contribs)

If your job is marketing for this organization, then you are by Wikipedia's definition a paid editor. A declaration of this is both mandatory and non-negotiable. Please make use of the {{paid}} template to make the required disclosure before making any further edits to Wikipedia.

Please note that even after you make the declaration, you are still obligated to follow Wikipedia's rules regarding conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand where and how to use this paid feature? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rashed at Bilqas SC (talk • contribs)

Rashed at Bilqas SC, here's how:

Copy this: {{paid|user=Rashed at Bilqas SC|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
go to User:Rashed at Bilqas SC
paste what you copied
change the first "InsertName" to the name of your employer and the second one to the name of your/his client.
add your signature by writing ~~~~
save the page.

Please do not make any edit to any other page until you have done that. Once it is done, you should not make any edit to any article page you are paid to edit; you may request changes by using {{request edit}} on the talk-page. Please read about edit-warring, and avoid it with care – you are very close to getting yourself into trouble at Belkas SC. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Belkas SC. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Create a new page Bilqas SC

Hi there,

I want to create a new page with the name Bilqas SC by the way I don't take any money from marketing consultancy. It is a position of honor only Rashed at Bilqas SC (talk) 19:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:PAID: "Interns, on-loan staff, and unpaid workers, including volunteers, are deemed to be employees. If they are directed or expected to edit Wikipedia as part of their tasks, they must make a paid-contribution disclosure." This applies to you, therefore a disclosure is necessary. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have done this on your userpage, so thank you. If you want to request changes to the article, please review Wikipedia:Edit requests and then post your request at Talk:Belkas SC. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Drm310

Hello, Rashed at Bilqas SC. You have new messages at Talk:Belkas SC.
Message added 16:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:13, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing from certain pages (Belkas SC and Bilqas SC) for distributive editing / edit warring.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You took the words outta my mouth.-- Deep fried okra 12:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Belkas SC

"All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." You may suggest changes if you have RS for any content you wish added. -- Deep fried okra 12:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may not add content to the talk page.-- Deep fried okra 12:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rashed at Bilqas SC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Itried on talk page with no answer, and the current page contains no cites or even rich in content.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rashed at Bilqas SC (talk) 12:43, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rashed at Bilqas SC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, I understand and I will just make useful contributions only Rashed at Bilqas SC (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Mohamed Suliman

Hello, Rashed at Bilqas SC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mohamed Suliman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mohamed Tolba

Hello, Rashed at Bilqas SC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mohamed Tolba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]