User talk:Rarian rakista

Hello World!

Asperous taste

Hello Rarian rakista! About your change to Chokecherry, I totally agree that asperous is a texture, not a taste. It seems weird that a concoction would have this texture, though. I wonder if "acrid" is what is meant (I have tasted chokecherries, and can confirm that the "choke" probably refers to the taste as much as to the little stones). Best wishes, Nadiatalent (talk) 14:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, will give it another look. Thanks. --Rarian rakista (talk) 02:06, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Frau Pfefferkuchenhaus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Frau Pfefferkuchenhaus, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rorshacma (talk) 18:35, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frau Pfefferkuchenhaus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frau Pfefferkuchenhaus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frau Pfefferkuchenhaus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. This is also Sven Manguard 18:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rarian rakista (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 24.20.132.97. Not a bot, just gigabit ethernet at home. Rarian Rakista (talk) 23:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP address is not blocked. If you've been using a proxy or a VPN, note that it may take up to 24 hours for the block to clear, once you disable your proxy/vpn. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.