User talk:Raresoul

Please Don't

Please don't remove templates that are put up on pages, unless the conditions have been satisfied. Spoken Word Soul still has no sources and its notability is questionable.Silver seren 00:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See, thats all you had to do. :) Silver seren 01:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Raresoul, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Please find out a little more about Wikipedia categorization before you put "general" articles in your new category. You sort of implied that all poetry and all performance art are Spoken Word Soul, which you probably didn't mean at all. Best wishes, RobertG ♬ talk 09:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Lyefook

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Omar Lyefook, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://illinoisentertainer.com/2006/10/31/soul-survivor-2/print/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Omar Lyefook. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MastCell ^Talk 22:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Lyefook

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Omar Lyefook, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://illinoisentertainer.com/2006/10/31/soul-survivor-2/print/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 23:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning...

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Omar Lyefook. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Scientizzle 23:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Please see WP:COPYRIGHT...you've copied & pasted text from other sources again. That's not okay. Take this time to review our copyright rules.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

— Scientizzle 23:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solarradio.com

A tag has been placed on Solarradio.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Solarradio.com. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. WebHamster 20:28, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shades of J

A tag has been placed on Shades Of J, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim}^dagnabbit!) 23:07, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Shades Of J:

Your recent edit to Shades Of J (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 00:13, 12 August 2007 (UTC) Raresoul 00:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC)I understand[reply]

October 2010

Please do not change sourced content or add original research, as you did to Neo soul. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. - Dan56 (talk) 04:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spoken word soul

The article Spoken word soul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The artists mentioned in this article have all combined spoken word with musical accompaniment. However, someone seems to have retroactively applied "spoken word soul" to what are actually diverse styles of music, possibly based on a quote by Shades of J (who released an album called Spoken World Soul). See Talk:Spoken word soul.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gyrofrog (talk) 21:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Spoken word soul. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 03:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]