User talk:Rara929

This is Rara929's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: F.L.Y. (roller coaster) (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F.L.Y. (roller coaster) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:F.L.Y. (roller coaster), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Amkgp 💬 14:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rara929! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ Amkgp 💬 14:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:F.L.Y. (roller coaster)

Hello, Rara929. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:F.L.Y. (roller coaster), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:F.L.Y. (roller coaster)

Hello, Rara929. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "F.L.Y.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 15:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Rara929

Thank you for creating Flink (company).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:38, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Sylvain Lesné

Please engage the article talk page at Talk:Sylvain Lesné, specifically this section to discuss your edits. When you are citing a source that is already used in the article, you can avoid creating double entries to the same source by using a named ref, as I've explained on article talk. You reintroduced a webforum citation on text where it is not needed, after I explained on talk, and it is not an optimal source for that particular text; see also WP:CITATIONOVERKILL. The Alzheimer's Forum can be used for certain kinds of sourcing, but it is a primary source. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Bougas

Hey, I wanted to let you know that (and why) I removed the material you added to the Nick Bougas article. I removed the descriptor "Neonazi" from the lead because it is not something that appears in the source references, meaning if you added it based on your personal observations it would be original research. I also removed the description of one of his cartoons because the reference cites Reddit, which is generally not a reliable source. Let me know if you have any questions about this! --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 17:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm SamX. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, BlackCat (cyber gang), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 17:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

In this series of edits, you (per your edit summaries) "repositioned" nearly all of the information in the article. And this is fine, except your edits appear to have not been mindful of sourcing at all: removing some references, repositioning information without taking the associated references with it, leaving references at the end of a paragraph but moving unrelated information into the paragraph. The article is now a disaster in terms of sourcing, with WP:V and WP:SOURCEHIJACKING issues. You have already had several warnings relating to various sourcing errors dating back nearly two years, and it is more serious to be making such errors when handling a crime-related BLP, so it is probably time you read WP:V and WP:CITE before making any more edits. Kingsif (talk) 21:21, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All sources I included made previous sources redundant because articles published on him include all previous details on his criminal case.

Be more specific in your criticism, especially if you use grand register like "desaster". Provide the information that lacked a source after my edits. Otherwise I am afraid I cannot change my editing style. Rara929 (talk) 12:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Youknow? (talk) 09:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Encoded Talk 💬 13:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]