User talk:Rapunzelina

Greetings,

Hours of Catherine of Cleves

A note to say that I thought this a very interesting and thorough article, which I much enjoyed. It is probably a bit late to leave the formal Welcome template, as you are already finding your way around, but I have added it anyway (just take if off again if you don't want it there). Please do feel free to contact me via my Talk page if I can be of help. HeartofaDog (talk) 19:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rapunzelina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Multiple Refs

If you mean more than one reference attached to a single point, then it is like this: [blah blah blah]<ref>first ref</ref><ref>second ref</ref>, which gives a visible result of: [blah blah blah]¹²

If however what you mean is that you want to repeat a particular reference at different points throughout, then it is a bit more complicated, in that you have to give it a name the first time it occurs, like this: [blah blah blah]<ref name="blah">repeating ref</ref> ... [blah2, blah2, blah2]<ref name="blah"> ... [blah3, blah3, blah3]<ref name="blah"> which gives a visible result of: [blah blah blah]³...[blah2, blah2, blah2]³...[blah3, blah3, blah3]³

You can find more detail and more examples at Help:Footnotes and WP:Footnotes.

Have fun with your future articles, to which I will look forward. Don't hesitate to contact me if I can be of help. All best, HeartofaDog (talk) 22:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(The) Rohan Hours

Sorry not to reply sooner - I don't spend much time on Wikipedia at this time of year.

The move, though I can see that it must be irritating, is not vandalism - cf this passage from Wikipedia:Naming conventions (books)#Manuscripts:

"Although, for example, the Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry is at the same time a manuscript and a book, for such items it is the "manuscript names" naming conventions guideline that deals with article naming.

By contrast Les très riches heures du Duc de Berry, published in 1984, ISBN 3-85672-025-1, a two volume facsimile + commentaries edition of the "Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry" manuscript, is a book in the meaning of the present guideline."

So "The Jungle Book" as a book-title retains the "The", but an article about the Rohan Hours, because it is about a manuscript, should not have the "The" before it. (The guidelines above make the further point that such articles are about the manuscripts, not about later books about the manuscripts).

Please let me know if there are other points that you would like to discuss.

I hope you are having an enjoyable Christmas, and best wishes for the New Year. HeartofaDog (talk) 17:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Order of Hermes (Ars Magica)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Order of Hermes (Ars Magica), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order of Hermes (Ars Magica). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? 90.209.153.74 (talk) 11:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Kirby

Hey there. In case you weren't aware, I nominated Jack Kirby for "Good Article" despite some issues we knew it had; we figured we'd take a chance and see if we're able to fix it up on the go. The review has just started, and the reviewer has identified a number of trouble spots in need of work. We may not be able to fix it up enough to get it to GA at this time, but I think this would be a great opportunity to put some work into improving the article in general. See the reviewer's comments and fix anything you can, or just have a look at the article and work on anything you can identify yourself. Thanks, and thanks for what you've already done on this one. :) BOZ (talk) 23:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eleven Samurai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Origin: Spirits of the Past, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Agito and Gonzo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to From Up on Poppy Hill may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rapunzelina. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rapunzelina. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]