User talk:Rappl

The article Rose Ariane Pearl P. Lope has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Ariane2.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Ariane2.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Ariane2.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Ariane2.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 14:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Rose Ariane Pearl P. Lope. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Also, don't put fake protection tags on articles. NawlinWiki 14:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted again -- if you want to write about yourself, use your user page. NawlinWiki 14:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rose Ariane Pearl P. Lope

A tag has been placed on Rose Ariane Pearl P. Lope requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onorem♠Dil 15:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as Rose Ariane Pearl P. Lope, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 15:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ariane2.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Ariane2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Addhoc 15:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jawe.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Jawe.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. bluemask ^(talk) 16:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Junior-details.pdf

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Junior-details.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:21, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carlette marie quinto

The article Carlette marie quinto has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as Carlette marie quinto, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Ariane.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ariane.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 11:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ariane001.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ariane001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hello, your userpage has been deleted per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rappl. --Tikiwont (talk) 07:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ariane.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ariane.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 05:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the F do you think you're doing?!?!?

putting ur name in the cast, you pathetic imaginative wuss!

[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.114.161 (talk) 23:45, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]