User talk:Raphaelbm

removal of KIT link Nov/Dec 2016

Vandalism of Critics section (again) the effect of which seems to be to remove the word KIT. Critics section replaced accordingly. Raphaelbm (talk) 12:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

removal of KIT link Nov 8th 2012

Vandalism of Critics section the effect of which seems to be to remove the word KIT. Source of vandalism was IP 210.86.36.138 from New Zealand. We shall have to keep watching this area and re-instate as required. Raphaelbm (talk) 20:20, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

removal of kit link Jul 2012

Erroneous removal of "Critics" section 25Jul2012: Yesterday an apparently reputable "wikipedia editor"(Koavf)inadvertently removed the "Critics" links from the wikipedia page. This link showed Peregrine and the KIT Group Archive. I have reinstated the information. I have explained to wikipedia that the critics are an important part of the encyclopedia entry for Bruderhof.

Vandalism: At 03:44, 12 May 2011 a small vandalism attempt was made. ClueBot spotted it and reverted the page successfully. Well done ClueBot! Keep watching this page. I note that 30 people are watching this page so there is some interest in the content.

Hi, I shall revise the sections to take account of the duplication of the KIT links. (Raphaelbm (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hi, I removed the link in the critics section not because it is not relevant, but because that page is already linked in the text. This was basically a cleanup. There is no need for the redundancy. However, the link should be removed entirely according to this guideline of unacceptable links: "Links to social networking sites (such as Myspace and Facebook), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or e-mail lists." Found on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:External_links I personally would not have a problem with the link, but it does go against Wikipedia guidelines, and having it two times is a redundancy that bloats the page. Thanks. Mikeatnip (talk) 15:32, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 19:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

loggin in not required

Hi, I undid your revert on the Bruderhof page. I don't know why you are requiring the editor to log in. Anonymous editing is allowed, although not preferred. And no, it wasn't my anonymous edit. Thanks. Mikeatnip (talk) 22:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]