User talk:Randygeorge

Welcome!

Hello Randygeorge, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Skomorokh 20:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Men's rights

If you wish to improve the body references, then do so. Read WP:LEAD. 9 cite tags in the first paragraph is excessive. Put them in the body, or better still, supply your own references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manway (talk • contribs) 18:34, 21 August 2010

Assume good faith.

Hi, just a reminder to assume good faith and remain civil when interacting with other editors on Wikipedia as, for example, in editing Masculism. Rather than engaging in a revert war (which takes two), work things out on the discussion page. Always feel free to solicit mediation if you feel you are not able to reach a consensus with other editors. Cheers, Vectro (talk) 02:43, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please change your name

Please change your name to one without sexual reference. You can use Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple. Sugar-Baby-Love (talk) 00:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

STOP

If you continue with the distortion of sourced material across pages and the removal of cited material that disagrees with your POV, administrator attention may be required. Sugar-Baby-Love (talk) 18:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

RandyGeorge -- please see my response regarding Wikipedia:Content noticeboard#Antifeminism. Basically, I would suggest that you calmly file an RFC. -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 21:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disrupting, negative behavior

I had thought that you have stopped your disruptive, POV-pushing editing done in this single-purpose account. I see that I was mistaken. You continue to be reverted by multiple editors as you attempt to add your own prejudices and biases onto Wikipedia, which is supposed to be a neutral encyclopedia. If you continue with this behavior, I will have no choice but to ask for some kind of Administrator intervention. Sugar-Baby-Love (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cybermud. Randygeorge (talk) 15:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All your base are belong to us--Cybermud (talk) 00:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]