It is suspected that this user has used one or more accounts abusively. The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended. See block log and lists of suspected and confirmed accounts.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Daniel Radcliffe, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. faithless(speak)19:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image source problem with Image:Troy and Gabriella sing "Everyday".png
Thanks for uploading Image:Troy and Gabriella sing "Everyday".png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 00:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Carly Jacks.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Carly Jacks.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Thank you for uploading Image:Laurawright2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Thank you for uploading Image:Jacks Carly Corinthos.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
I have put all the licensed pictures back in the article. Please do not change them to unlicensed disputed free image pictures. The file name is not important, the picture is. If you need any help, feel free to contact me. IrishLass (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading Image:Potc1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Laurawright2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Potc1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Carly as teen.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Carly as teen.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Thank you for uploading Image:Carly as teen.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Thank you for uploading Image:CarolineCarly Jacks.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Thank you for uploading Image:Carly2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Thank you for uploading Image:CarlyRoberts.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Your copyright violation pictures have been and will continue to be removed from the Carly Corinthos article. Do not put images that are not allowed on Wikipedia in articles. They will be immediately removed. KellyAna (talk) 01:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can also not use actress promotional pictures in articles, see other soap articles, it is an illegal use of images. Please stop adding illegal images. Also, do not remove clean up tags, those are there for a reason and removing them without taking care of the issue the article was tagged for. This is also a violation. KellyAna (talk) 00:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Carly Corinthos Jacks.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Carly Corinthos Jacks.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Your upload of image of an actress for use in a character article is prohibited. The picture has been changed to an allowable picture. Do not revert to an illegal image. And unless you took the picture yourself, you didn't "make" anything. You downloaded the image but you didn't take it and you didn't make it. KellyAna (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image Copyright problem - you cannot claim an image is yours and you cannot license an image you steal from a website. The website owns the work, not you. Screen caps for story purposes are allowed but actor images are not. Stop uploading illegal images. KellyAna (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked You have been blocked for repeatedly uploading copyrighted images with false license declarations for 12 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I only edited what was nessicary and I uploaded images from the ABC website of GH. I put the info in. KellyAnn, who is another lying loser, is making sure the page is innacurate. Therefore getting me blocked. My name is Randy Jaiyan
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
And your gross incivility has been reported. I only removed your illegal images by reverting what you did. Illegal images are not allowed. You were warned and blocked for violating the rules. Blame yourself for your actions and consequences. I am not to blame nor am I a liar or a loser. KellyAna (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Carly Samantha BabyGirl 22.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Carly Samantha BabyGirl 22.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
You are not being reported for multiple levels of vandalism. For one, Wikipedia has guidelines and all your page moves do not violate policy. Carly Corinthos Jacks's common name, see WP:Common names, is Corinthos Jacks. You moves Claudia Zacchara and the placement of legal images . I know you know policy before moving pages again. You've been reported. KellyAna (talk) 14:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image Copyright problemThere is only one thing to understand, that's WIKIPEDIA POLICY and you keep violating it with your page moves. STOP moving the pages against policy. You're continued moves are VANDALISM. KellyAna (talk) 18:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading Image:Bio brown.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:CarolineCarly Jacks.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:ClaudiaJohnny.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Bio brown.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neil, Please unblock me. I just wanted to correct Wikipedia with Carly Corinthos Jacks. It was stated before.
Learn the policy. She's NOT NOT NOT Jacks. If you would leave it as Carly Corinthos and not harass me you might be allowed to edit. Additionally your creation of multiple Claudia Zacchara articles along with the multiple Carly articles you created you don't deserve to have your account unblocked. Your edits are continually disruptive they have been since you arrived. KellyAna (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I then pledge to no longer make any disruptive edits and promise not to attack you, KellyAnn. I still support Carly Corinthos Jacks/Carly Jacks due to the fact that ABC (Official GH Website) and Soapnet and soaps.com and others specify Carly Corinthos Jacks or Caroline Benson Jacks or Carly Jacks.
You still refuse to read policy WP:Common names and you still refuse not to make disruptive edits as you insist on moving a page. Seems as though you haven't learned anything. Oh, and for the record, soapcentral.com lists her as Carly Corinthos, no Jacks. Read the policy I've cited, read it and understand it. KellyAna (talk) 22:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I promised to never make disruptive edits. You have accused me of being a simpletone because I dont learn anything. I cant believe this. It is my personal opinion. ABC and the others agree on Carly Corinthos Jacks. I declare truce. You call me a sock one more time and I will report you. This is my final warning.
No one called you a simpleton. No one said you don't learn anything but personal opinion has no place in articles. There is a policy that says the name a character is commonly know by all is what that character should be listed as. Carly Corinthos is the known name. I have also not called you a sock so your "final warning" is not appropriate and you can't report me for not doing anything. However, you did create a new account and it was others that agreed that you were a sockpuppeteer and that account was blocked. While you are blocked you should also look up reliable sources and, again, read the common names policy. KellyAna (talk) 23:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How can I Trust you ? You told Neil and then when he blocked me, you said Thanks. I will not make innapropriate edits. Check out the website (ABC). THey stated Corinthos Jacks. Other articles on General Hospital also say and link to Carly Corinthos Jacks.
I follow policy, period. You violate policy at every turn. Who's the trustworthy one here? Then there's you that won't listen to POLICY OF WIKIPEDIA. ABC's website changes, but Wikipedia stays with commonly known names. Carly Corinthos is known to many more than Carly Corinthos Jacks. You've stated you are going to violate policy the minute you are unblocked, it's obvious you have no intention of not disrupting Wikipedia the minute you get the chance. I told Neil thanks because you broke policy. Abide by policy and they'll be no need for "telling." KellyAna (talk) 00:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC0)
EVEN WIKIPEDIA LINKS THEIR GH ARTICLES TO CARLY CORINTHOS JACKS. I PROMISE NOT TO DO INAAPROPRIATE EDITS THE SECOND I GET THE CHANCE. YOU ARE GLAD I AM BLOCKED BECUASE YOU WERE SAYING THANKS TO NEIL WHEN HE BLOCKED ME. JASON ROBERTS 13578 IS MY FRIEND'S ACCOUNT WHO I ASKED TO MAKE THE CLAUDIA ZACCHARA ARTICE BECAUSE SHE IS A CHARACTER. YOU ARE REALLY GOING TO BE EMBARASSED WHEN LAURA WRIGHT SAYS CARLY CORINTHOS JACKS IS HER NAME ON GH. SHE IS CREDITED AS CARLY CORINTHOS JACKS ON ABC/CTV AT THE END OF THE SHOW AT THE CREDITS. IF THAT DOESNT CONVINCE YOU, WHAT THE HECK DOES?
Yelling aka typing in all caps certainly doesn't help anyone believe you. As to the Claudia articles, you were told they were deleted so you telling someone else to go ahead and create the article is yet another disruptive edit and violation of policy. You just aren't getting it. KellyAna (talk) 01:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I get it. You hate me for correcting wikipedia. Oh, that sounds wierd cause it's an ENCYCLOPEDIA. It is now Carly Corinthos Jacks in my mind. Soon, someone will change it right. I no longer trust this encyclopedia and I will send it in a chain letter, KellyAnn. Since you hate Jacks, I will call you KellyAnn Jacks. Caroline Corinthos Jacks. PERIOD.
Oh, I don't hate or love anything, I have no emotional attachment, I have a policy attachment and policy states what it should be. It can be whatever you want it to be in your mind, policy says different.KellyAna (talk) 01:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Policy meant Carly Corinthos Jacks. You mean Carly Corinthos. Kelly Ann Jacks, please, numerous official websites Indicate Corinthos Jacks. Soapnet is a FANSITE. Go check ABC out, KellyAnn Jacks.--76.69.241.254 (talk) 01:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You really do not understand. The article body can say Jacks but the page location needs to stay Carly Corinthos so everyone can find the page. I don't know where you get that soapnet is a fansite, they are owned by ABC and are not a fansite. Not that anyone mentioned it in the first place but you are wrong about what they are. You should really take this time to understand policy around here so you can constructively edit when you are allowed back. I'll actually be surprised if you aren't blocked for gross incivility again. You're personal attacks are out of hand. KellyAna (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How am i being gross (icivility), Kellyann Jacks, Anyone can finsd Corinthos Jacks because Carly Corinthos can be redirected. Oh Dry! Cassé! Next Time, try to come up with something smarter than a kindergarden child (but they may be smarter than you). ABC owns GH. ABC says Carly Corinthos Jacks. ABC SAYS. ABC says. ABC says, KellyAnn Jacks.
It's gross incivility. When you insist on calling me something that I am not, that incivility. The kindergarden remark, (which by the way, it's kindergarten, not garden) is also gross incivility. The picture isn't allowed on your page, so it's been removed. You just keep continuing to violate policy with every comment. Just read the policies and stop with the behavior.KellyAna (talk) 02:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whats up with this prolonged block until April, Kelly Ann Jacks? Why am I being through this. I should be able to edit now.
Don't blame me, you did this to yourself. See the bottom of your page. Yamla did it for your behavior and I didn't have a thing to do with it. KellyAna (talk) 03:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Yamla (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You were caught avoiding your block by continuing to edit via 76.69.241.254 (talk·contribs). Your block has now been extended to one month as a result of your abusive actions. Please consider this your absolute last chance. Any further vandalism, block evasion, or incivility may result in you being banned permanently. --Yamla (talk) 15:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
After promising to leave Wikipedia for six months, this abusive vandal immediately returned as HIBigdog (talk·contribs), a transparent sockpuppet related to the blocked account, Wabigdog (talk·contribs). This is another in a series of false promises by Randy Jaiyan. As he has shown over and over again that he cannot be trusted either to keep his word or to abide by Wikipedia policies and guidelines, I would no longer support unblocking him after six months, as I earlier stated. --Yamla (talk) 13:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Daniel Radcliffe, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. faithless (speak) 19:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
![00:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Randy_Jaiyan#c-B-2008-01-17T00:24:00.000Z-Image_source_problem_with_Image:Troy_and_Gabriella_sing_"Everyday".png){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KellyAna (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}