User talk:Randstrand
December 2018
[edit]
Hello, I'm 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:D14B:49AC:1258:8D55. I noticed that you recently removed content from Delta Air Lines without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:D14B:49AC:1258:8D55 (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Non English references
[edit]A recent edit summary of yours justifying deleting a reference is not supported by WP:RSUE. The options in this case are to leave the reference even if it is not very good or useful. Find an English language reference or delete the detail entirely as unreferenced.Andrewgprout (talk) 14:45, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
While warning me of a potential 3RR breaking - I note taht you went ahead and did so already. Please be careful as you can easily be blocked from editing for edit warring like this. Andrewgprout (talk) 04:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)