User talk:RandomWeatherTracker

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "ChumsworthAnimations", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Leonidlednev (talk) 00:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hurricane Lisa

Hey, I saw that you have recreated and submitted the Hurricane Lisa article. I would bring this up on the talk page as we have already decided it did not meet notability requirements. Also, if you want to, I think that the previous attempt had more data included as it had over 3000 more bytes than your iteration. ✶Mitch 199811✶ 02:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If if were to bring it up on the talk page, they would redirect it without letting me do anything. I'm fairly new to wikipedia, so i don't know what i should do. But I think I will restore the other one. ChumsworthAnimations (talk) 04:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They do have their reasons for not having an article already. They wont just remove the draft just because you are new and if they try to re-redirect the draft I will try to defend you. The current consensus is that Lisa is just like any other Central American hurricane. ✶Mitch 199811✶ 04:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok but tbf, Nana has an article, and it also did similar impacts to Lisa. A state of emergency was issued in Belize after it, which is notable in its own right. I will leave something on the talk page. ChumsworthAnimations (talk) 04:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bring that up in the talk page. ✶Mitch 199811✶ 04:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I just did. ChumsworthAnimations (talk) 04:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, thank you for all you are trying to do to help me. ChumsworthAnimations (talk) 04:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Hurricane Chandler per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Chandler. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

TonyBallioni (talk) 02:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]