User talk:RandomPerson81
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi RandomPerson81! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 03:52, Monday, September 5, 2016 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi RandomPerson81! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 03:52, Monday, September 5, 2016 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, RandomPerson81, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 06:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
[edit]
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Conventions on warnings
[edit]I don't even remember where I picked this up from, but the convention seems to be to arrange user warnings under unified section names like "October 2019" or "November 2019". I'm pretty sure the idea is to group warnings together by 'when' the problems were.
Certainly for an IP editor it makes it easier to see that it is a sequence of bad edits by one person. Since an IP could be reassigned to another person we want to detect a gap in times. See User talk:12.153.197.45 for an example.
For a named editor such as User talk:Lwoelnflascknepwfcsa I think it is still a good idea. It makes checking that warnings have been issued in correct order: uw-v1 then uw-v2 etc.
We want to make is easier for admins to see: there really is a problem, warnings have been issued correctly, and the posted notice at WP:AIV is appropriate (e.g. [1]).
And I try not to do too much checking for vandals in one day. It makes me very grumpy (@#&^ vandals!) and I have to go fix 20 typos before I feel better. Shenme (talk) 05:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of The Fyrelit Tragedy for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fyrelit Tragedy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DanCherek (talk) 04:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarkora until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.