User talk:Randallg320

March 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Broken (House). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 16:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, Randallg320. You have new messages at AlexTheWhovian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Alex|The|Whovian 04:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bergen op Zoom Canadian War Cemetery Entrance.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bergen op Zoom Canadian War Cemetery Entrance.jpg, which you've attributed to Elizabeth Clarke. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to The Second Coming (poem) have been removed because you cited the information you added to IMDb. As discussed at WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is considered a questionable source, and generally should not be used as a sole reference. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reliable source, or with an additional source confirming the information from IMDb. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Also, please review WP:IPCV. DonIago (talk) 06:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the record I have never contributed to IMDB and did not even know it is possible. I was simply copying the style of other entries such as the one for The Sopranos. Is there an acceptable remedy? Randallg320 (talk) 17:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Providing a source other than IMDb would resolve IMDb-related concerns. You also haven't indicated that you read WP:IPCV as I suggested. DonIago (talk) 04:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]