Jump to content

User talk:Rana Orabi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Customer service ‎. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 03:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rana Orabi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I just want to help the audience by add some useful links that proved them with a good resources from any websites i know please unblock me, i read all the guideline and the policy. I will keep up the good work and the environment safe Rana Orabi (talk) 22:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 22:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rana Orabi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand why I have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions instead. As i read all the guideline and the policy

Decline reason:

Copying and pasting the points given to you by Yamla is insufficient; you must demonstrate your understanding by specifically explaining what you did wrong, how you will avoid doing it again, and what topics you want to edit about if unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 22:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Rana Orabi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
102.186.28.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: You are directly blocked. Yamla (talk) 23:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rana Orabi (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #30394 was submitted on 2020-05-01 00:07:47. This review is now closed.


--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 00:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rana Orabi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked because I put external links used for advertising or promotion only, and that happened by mistake I will not going to do it again. If you unblock me I will put a request first her with all the details I want, if I saw any external links or content need to be edit so you can review them first. please unblock me

Decline reason:

This was not a mistake; your comment here clearly shows that you were attempting the well-known and long-ineffective dead-link replacement scam. Yunshui  07:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rana Orabi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

yes I admit it, I put external links used for advertising or promotion only and I will not going to do it again, i didnt read the guideline but now I did well. If you unblock me I will put a request first her with all the details I want, if I saw any external links or content need to be edit so you can review them first. please unblock me. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rana Orabi (talkcontribs) 00:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hi Rana Orabi, thank you very much for the honest appeal. The community is open to second chances, and you will probably be welcomed back. However, your appeal does not explain which edits you would like to make in the future. Please take more time before creating another appeal; there is no deadline. The "standard offer" even mentions "six months" as a suggested timespan. When you appeal the block again, please:
  • Take your time. Don't rush writing an appeal yet.
  • Mention again that you had been intending to spam using reference links, but that you understand that Wikipedia is not for promotion, and that you will not make promotional contributions again.
  • Explain that you understand what a conflict of interest is, and that you will not edit about your conflicts of interest again.
  • Provide examples for edits you would like to make in the future. See the community portal and the Task Center for ideas. Be specific: Which articles, which edits?
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.