User talk:Ramzilahrach00

December 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Swedish language, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 21:45, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Latvian language. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thomas.W ^talk 21:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalai Muhammad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kalai Muhammad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Thomas.W ^talk 21:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 3 of ♦ _{I go}^first 15:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Norwegian language, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 10:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Norwegian language. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for repeated unsourced edits on multiple articles about languages. Thomas.W ^talk 21:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Final warning for regularly and repeatedly made unsourced, unexplained and in most cases obviously not true edits on articles relating to languages, in teh latest batch of such edits on Languages of the United States, German language, Italian language and Languages of Norway, in addition to Norwegian language above. Thomas.W ^talk 21:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Languages of Finland. User continues to vandalize pages with blatantly bogus information. hydrox (talk) 17:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]