Hi RamshackleMan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).
What you wrote failed to indicate that the character is notableindependently from the work in which he appears.
All that said, this is somewhat different from what we normally see when someone creates an article on an individual character that had previously been included in a list of characters from that work, in that what you wrote provided considerably more information than what is present about him in List of Star Wars characters. There may well be a case to be made that Wicket should have an independent article; but that case must be made by citing sources.
I see you have not been editing here long; so forgive me if you already know this, but what you wrote is not gone. If you want to use it as a draft and continue working on it to address my concerns, you can find it by finding your name in the "View history" tab at the top of the page, clicking the most recent date and time that you edited the article, and then editing what comes up. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving14:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, RamshackleMan. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Eva Eugenio, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Eva Eugenio to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
The above note is automatically generated. I came back to your talk page to give you a little more information than the automatically generated notes does. First, it's really important in any article that you cite sources, but it's especially important in an article about a living person whose reputation could be affected by false information in Wikipedia. Therefore Wikipedia has a policy that requires deletion for any articles about living people that cite no sources at all. However, you have a 7 day grace period to add sources to the article. As long as even one source is added, the article won't be deleted. If you need help figuring out how to cite sources, let me know, or ask at the Teahouse (I see someone has already left you an invitation to the Teahouse above). ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving15:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wicket W. Warrick, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Endor and Kenny Baker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You claim on the Gama Singh image that it is your image. But what can you do to verify that. Anybody can claim an image is their image. Further proof is needed. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it!23:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, RamshackleMan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hey, thanks for your recent adds to various Star Wars articles, I especially appreciate the citations! I just wanted to alert you to the fact that while updating the redirects Amilyn Holdo and FN-2199, you seem to have inadvertently altered the {{R from fictional character}} and {{R to section}} templates (substituting an H or an F for the R). Just wanted to let you know in case you were copy-pasting other redirects as well. Thanks! — TAnthonyTalk15:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, there are a bunch more and I'm fixing them now. You seem to be using the first letter of the last name of the entry, but these templates are not for sorting, the R stands for Redirect and they place the redirect into appropriate categories. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk15:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello RamshackleMan: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 09:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rose Tico Star Wars.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, RamshackleMan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thank you for your contribution. The article does contain some weasel words that indicate a lack of neutrality. You can read WP:PEA for methods on how to improve those.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wicket W. Warrick (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
