User talk:Ramez Nashat

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ursulawhiteside.org/about/

January 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:33, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=I'm very sorry, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I didn't rephrase the citation, I understand copyrights perfectly now, and I'll make sure this doesn't happen again thank youRamez Nashat 08:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ramez Nashat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very sorry, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I didn't rephrase the citation, I understand copyrights perfectly now, and I'll make sure this doesn't happen again thank you Ramez Nashat 21:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Egyptian Petrochemicals Holding Company moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Egyptian Petrochemicals Holding Company, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Journal of Polymorphic Perversity

Hello, Ramez Nashat,

Thanks for creating Journal of Polymorphic Perversity! I edit here too, under the username Cwmhiraeth and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Besides copying and pasting from the source, you have got the name of the journal wrong. It should be "Journal of Polymorphous Perversity"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ramez Nashat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is copyright? Copyright is an automatic right, protected by the law, in several nations, the creator of any work can concede that right partially or entirely. It is temporary, copyright is one of two sorts of innovation rights, the other is patents, How is Wikipedia licenced? Through Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? Because violating copyrights affects creators and incurs legal consequences for Wikimedia foundation Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? Every innovative work is automatically copyrighted, Wikipedia must have authorization to utilize copyrighted works. unless it belongs to public domain, we can contact the copyright holders and ask them to allow us to use it under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) or a CC BY-SA-compatible license, also the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? I really didn't understand that I can't copy small excerpts, as in Youtube, I will never copy paste again anything for a copyrighted work, thank you. Ramez Nashat 14:20, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is not accurate. You appear to have missed WP:FAIRUSE. You are welcome to read that and make a new unblock request, correcting your mistakes. Yamla (talk) 14:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ramez Nashat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(Removed copyright violation) Ramez Nashat 16:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Multiple open unblock requests are not needed. I will leave the other one open. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ramez Nashat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me Ramez Nashat 10:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You violated copyright while defending yourself against your block for copyright violations. As such, to prevent further risk to Wikipedia, I have revoked talk page access. Another administrator will be along shortly to review your request. --Yamla (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Concept empiricism (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NOTDICT. Perhaps consider submitting over at Wiktionary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Concept empiricism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Concept empiricism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 15:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ramez Nashat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 15:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Balkan post-traumatic syndrome

Hello, Ramez Nashat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Balkan post-traumatic syndrome".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Egyptian Petrochemicals Holding Company

Hello, Ramez Nashat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Egyptian Petrochemicals Holding Company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Masum Reza^📞 20:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Concept empiricism

Hello, Ramez Nashat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Concept empiricism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 19:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 36262

UTRS appeal #36262 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"False-stalking syndrome" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect False-stalking syndrome. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 16#False-stalking syndrome until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 03:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]