User talk:Rambo.XIV

Rambo.XIV, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Rambo.XIV! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 00:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

More info at the Teahouse

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Rambo.XIV. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Rambo.XIV. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 16:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

February 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for image copyright violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rambo.XIV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realise the severity of my actions and ask for a reconsideration. Copyright violation is a serious offence and I respect the administrator's concerns. I edit pages only to help improve articles, but I understand that adding copyrighted images (despite how appropriate they are to an article) is not the best way to do this. I will refrain from being tempted to do this in the future.Rambo.XIV (talk) 1:03 pm, 23 February 2013, last Saturday (2 days ago) (UTC+0)

Accept reason:

After discussing the matter with Future Perfect at Sunrise, I'm unblocking your account. This is provisional on you refraining from image uploads for the next month, and obviously on the condition that you do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia again. Failure to abide by these conditions will result in your account being blocked again; next time, the block will probably be of indefinite duration. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I lifted your previous block on the understanding that you would no longer upload copyrighted images to Wikipedia. Since then you have uploaded File:Jim Clark Lotus.jpg and File:Stirling Moss Triumph.jpg, both of which were copyright violations. Since it's clear that you either do not understand or do not intend to abide by Wikipedia's policy on image copyright, I have blocked your account indefinitely. Yunshui 雲‍水 06:57, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲‍水 06:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox university golf team

Template:Infobox university golf team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Dark Knight Trilogy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dark Knight Trilogy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dark Knight Trilogy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Queen Mary University of London Golf Club

The article Queen Mary University of London Golf Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable student club, no mention found in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Queen Mary University of London Golf Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Queen Mary University of London Golf Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Mary University of London Golf Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]