User talk:Rama/Sexuality drawings

Nice drawings. You should add some gay male ones, though.

Thanks for adding some! :)

Um, maybe not...

Nice, nice. Although I wonder why only some and not all of them are being used in an article? ;p Mathmo

”Nice drawings. You should add some gay male ones, though.” Yes, it makes you gay. Faggot.

Peeping Penguin

The images are great, but the accessories are sometimes a bit confusing... e.g., the teddy bear... but even more so all that nerdy stuff... having sex while KDE is running... well, I guess it turns you on, but the average Wikipedia reader will just think 'what the FUCK' (pun intended). The Klein bottle on the autocunnilingus picture makes sense aesthetically (is it supposed to imply that autocunnilingus is not actually possible in three-dimensional space?), but what has Bjarne to do with the deckchair position? I just uploaded a JPG version of the missionary style image (without the teddy bear) that is used on Sexual intercourse. I love your sense of humor and had a good laugh looking at your pictures, although I'm not sure that Tux should really be gazing at orgasmic couples, considering he (or she?) is not even ten years old. Chrisahn 01:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I love your drawings -- they are both tasteful, educational, and erotic -- and I think the accessories are whimsical and entertaining, and don't in any way detract from the educational value of the pics. Kit O'Connell (Todfox: user / talk / contribs) 07:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pedobear?

Is the Teddy in the drawings a reference to the internet phnomenon known as pedobear? 207.69.19.49 (talk) 21:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.243.215 (talk) 03:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]