User talk:RaktimBanerjee
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, RaktimBanerjee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for University of Gour Banga. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Muhandes (talk) 16:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
[edit]Hello! I'm a bot created by another Wikipedia editor. I wanted to let you know that I removed a link that you recently added to the page Malda College here. I did this because http://www.facebook.com/pages/Malda-College/241014689296434 is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia.
We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk.
Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Malda College. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Also, please do not remove Maintenance templates. Thank you, -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 06:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Malda College. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 06:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Malda College, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Next addition of unsourced content, I'll be reporting you. Thanks, -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 06:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Malda College shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Muhandes (talk) 06:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Raktim, your changes keep getting undone because you have not provided citations to reliable sources. Unfortunately, Wikipedia cannot accept content based on personal knowledge. I'd recommend finding a book or website about the school, then adding information about the school (in your own words) based on what the book or website says, and adding a citation to the book or website. (See WP:Referencing for beginners for help.)
By the way, it's also best to always write from a neutral point of view and to set your own opinions aside when contributing.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Further, on the subject of writing from a neutral point of view, this edit included such language as "premier college", "one of the more sophisticated and enriched colleges", and words such as "excellent" and "impressive". That cannot by any stretch of the imagination be regarded as neutral reporting. Together with other aspects of your editing, such as links you have added, the overall impression is that you are trying to take over the article, and change it from an objective encyclopaedia article into a promotional prospectus for the college. Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- It is worth mentioning that the reason I came here was that another user reported you to an administrators' noticeboard for reporting vandals and spammers. Looking at this page, I see that others have warned you, but have perhaps have not made it clear to you what the problems were. I hope that things are now clearer, and if you take on board what said then you should be able to avoid the block which you were warned about. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Common names vs. official names
[edit]You might want to have a look at Wikipedia:Official names. --Muhandes (talk) 06:47, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)