User talk:Rajputana

Noticed your edits on Talk:Brahmin.Baka man 01:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SINGH

Would appreciate your help in monitoring SINGH article.

Gorkhali (talk) 19:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming by Singh article. This Harrybabbar has no idea about anything, and when he knows he is losing the arguement he screams "RSS" which I find both offensive and ridiculous.

I enjoyed reading your comments. I just don't get why on one hand this Harry chap claims to be part Rajput and then venomously hates Rajputs.

Gorkhali (talk) 08:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had to revert the discussion page because Ajjay changed his comments. I told him not to rv the discussion page because original comments are to be left. Your comment got taken out. Sorry.

Gorkhali (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

September 2008

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is the last and only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, especially by deleting sourced materials, as you did with this article , you will be blocked from editing.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Sindhutvavadin 01:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)