User talk:Rajesh Chauhan87

August 2022

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lonia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 18:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since i have seen the content which is fully wrong that's why i have edited. And wikipedia needs to correct the false content so that everyone can enjoy the right fact on the basis of strong evidence. So , hope you will satisfy my thought. Thanks Rajesh Chauhan87 (talk) 20:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lonia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 06:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lonia, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lonia was changed by Rajesh Chauhan87 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922761 on 2022-09-06T18:55:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:55, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lonia. dudhhr_Contribs^(he/they) 18:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir,

Every information which i had changed ,was a genuine and authentic. And this information whose you have reverted is totally false. I would like to inform you that this information is for the purpose of defamtion about Lonia .In this page lonia and nonia is same as told . But both caste are different. Lonia is not a caste but it is a community. Nonia is related to scheduled caste or tribes. While Lonia has the history which proves that they are Rajput and related to Royal family . Then without authenticity how have you reverted? I think you should think to availibilty of right information . Thats why everyone can know a right information about lonia community. Hope, you will satisfy from my explaination by which i can edit to provide right information.

Thank you

Regards

Rajesh Chauhan

(redacted) Rajesh Chauhan87 (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For your protection, I have removed your contact information. It is unwise to post it in this very public forum. Furthermore, unless sensitive personal information is involved, Wikipedia matters are handled on Wikipedia. To request unblock, please follow the instructions above. 331dot (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will now notify you of the special rules surrounding editing about social groups in South Asia. 331dot (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

331dot (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir,

i don't want more to edit .I want only to correct those information which i know very well on the basis of real and genuine fact. So, please give me permission by unblocking. And If, you understand hindi language then you can see in my attachment .You will be sure about the my giving information is true or false. And this page is defaming about lnia . All information which is made in the page is totally about Nonia caste .If some body made misinformation and flourish this with bad intention then, how can i accept? Please think about it . Rajesh Chauhan87 (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #62746

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Loniya

Hello, Rajesh Chauhan87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Loniya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]