User talk:Rajasekhar Naidu

Rajasekhar Naidu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rajasekhar Naidu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rajasekhar Naidu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Central Agricultural University, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 13:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I noticed that in this edit to Kamma (caste), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 13:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Central Agricultural University. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop adding self links to the article. Click the link you added and you will see it points to the article itself. Muhandes (talk) 00:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. This is in reply to your post on my talk page. Regards, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 01:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kamma (caste), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 07:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discrtionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 20:11, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kamma (caste), you may be blocked from editing. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 04:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I kept valid information

Why you people are deleted the genuine information with correct citation & now you are telling I'll block you. You people don't have knowledge about the history. If you want block. But you can't block the truth. Rajasekhar Naidu (talk) 08:27, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Vasireddy Venkatadri Nayudu. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you, if you we give references you are deleting. Why you're biased. Rajasekhar Naidu (talk) 02:20, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]