User talk:Rajamankkan

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Kuntan (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Kasaragod district

Hi, thanks for your message. This article is very frustrating. Basically one copyvio was placed over another copyvio. Which explains why there still was one left. I deleted the article and made it into a small stub. No copyvio there at all! Garion96 (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chakyar Koothu

Hi, this is to inform you that the contents of the article Chakyar Koothu are original. Most of it was prepared by me only. The website that you are referring is pretty new one and they have extensively used wiki articles as resources. So i am removing the copy violation tag from the article.I appreciat your attempts. Thanking you Sreekanthv 04:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajamankkan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

shared system of an educational institution, the blocking admin should have looked at the contributions

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry confirmed by Checkuser Dmcdevit here. -- Netsnipe ► 13:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.