User talk:Raj0216

Welcome!

Hello, Raj0216, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Inderchand Rajgarhia & Sons (P) Ltd., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! UltraMagnus (talk) 15:37, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Inderchand Rajgarhia & Sons (P) Ltd.

A tag has been placed on Inderchand Rajgarhia & Sons (P) Ltd., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. UltraMagnus (talk) 15:37, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Inderchand Rajgarhia & Sons (P) Ltd.. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. UltraMagnus (talk) 15:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Inderchand Rajgarhia & Sons (P) Ltd.. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. UltraMagnus (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Inderchand Rajgarhia & Sons (P) Ltd.

A tag has been placed on Inderchand Rajgarhia & Sons (P) Ltd., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. UltraMagnus (talk) 16:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Inderchand Rajgarhia & Sons (P) Ltd., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. UltraMagnus (talk) 16:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Your recent addition to Taj Mahal has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The additions also violated WP:FRINGE Abecedare (talk) 17:38, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Rani Sati Temple

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Rani Sati Temple, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.aapnodesh.com/cities-and-attraction/rani-sati-temple-jhunjhunu/. As a copyright violation, Rani Sati Temple appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Rani Sati Temple has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Rani Sati Temple and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Rani Sati Temple with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Rani Sati Temple.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jat Heartland.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nouniquenames (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jat Heartland.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rajaharia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 15:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Bajrang dal. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:12, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Rajaharia, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you spend some time reading our attitude regarding reliable sources and citing them. Also please note that although it is perfectly ok for you to remove previous warnings from your own talk page, doing so is deemed to be an acknowledgement that you have read them. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you goint to discuss this or just keep reiunstating your poor contributions as here? At present, you are breaching many of our policies and I think that we can now add edit warring to the list of problems that are arising. You'll find yourself blocked from contributing unless we can find some way to make progress. - Sitush (talk) 16:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

why dont you go and verify the facts around the article by urself. Just sitting infront of computer and giving ur edit opinion doesnt mean the the facts doesn't exist. Dont edit anything which u r not sure

Thanks for at least engaging. Please could you read WP:BURDEN - the responsibility for ensuring verifiability lies with the person who adds the material, not me. I do in fact know a fair amount about the various communities of India but I don't have time to source every little thing and, as I've explained previously, some of the sources that you mention are definitely not reliable. I am reverting you for now. You might want to consider drafting your next contribution in your sandbox and asking someone to review it before moving the (hopefully improved) information into the article itself. - Sitush (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajharia (November 21)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rajharia.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Raj0216, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your article submission Jat Heartland

Hello Raj0216. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Jat Heartland.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jat Heartland}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rajaharia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sitush (talk) 19:22, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Policy breaches

What is it that you do not understand in our verifiability policy? I have had to revert you again at Rajaharia. - Sitush (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Rajaharia

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Acabashi (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Caste sanctions

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Following your obvious edit warring at Rajaharia, please note the contents of the warning above. You should also note Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raj0216 as it seems very likely that you are using multiple accounts. WP:Citing sources, our reliable sources policy and our need for verifiability should also be borne in mind. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 15:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indef for abusive use of multiple accounts per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raj0216. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rajharia concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rajharia, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rajharia concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rajharia, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rajharia concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rajharia, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rajharia

Hello Raj0216. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rajharia".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Rajharia}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rajaharia

The article Rajaharia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Störm (talk) 16:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Jat Heartland.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Jat Heartland.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rani Sati Jhunjhunu.gif

The file File:Rani Sati Jhunjhunu.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Rani Sati Temple.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]