User talk:Raitchison

Operation COOKIE MONSTER

MacGyver

I read the arguments on this page quite carefully, but felt that the balance of the arguments pointed to delete (later changed to a merge, on request from User:A Nobody), However, if you wish this decision reviewed, please feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Deletion review. I'm quite open to the idea that other admins might view these arguments differently than I did. All the best Tim Vickers (talk) 16:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (Detroit Lions tv and radio networks)

Hey thanks for your support. Tell your friends. Go Lions.TomCat4680 (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: afd's

Yeah I realized that and I deleted them and wrote something else.TomCat4680 (talk) 19:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Overton (actress)

Oh... the filmology was nice to add so as to indicate that she's a working actor... but I think the notability was cinched by the reviews about her acting and directing. Everything else is icing on the cake. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.}

TomCat4680 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

TomCat4680 (talk) 14:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Raitchison. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Article Rescue Members are not necessarily inclusionists, all wikipedians are warmly welcome to join.~~~~

WebCitation.org

This is Raitchison's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Stile hack

Since you were one of the editors of the Stile hack/suicide advisory, here's a heads up: If you see such a hack or online event, use WebCitation.org to archive a copy of such pages in future. That way, we can use it in Wikipedia. Cheers. --Lexein (talk) 21:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase

Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

affluent

The word "affluent" has been reinserted into the West Hills page. There was a long discussion on this over on the Sherman Oaks page, and it has stayed off that page. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sherman_Oaks,_Los_Angeles#Affluence). User DrRc had removed this once already from the West Hills page, only to see it added back in.Phatblackmama (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Raitchison This has now turned into an edit war, with 4 reverts by one user.~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:CD8F:C70:ECB8:C663:419:924C (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]