User talk:Rainu2006

May 2015

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, false claims of vandalism, false report at RFPP, personal attacks, promotional edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 15:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rainu2006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

HI I am not shcok please unblock me Rainu2006 (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Seems to be an obvious case of WP:DUCK. only (talk) 16:25, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rainu2006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have understood why I am blocked and I will not do it again . I am not a shock of anyone I will follow all rule of Wikipedia . It was my mistake . I will follow all rules and regulation of Wikipedia community . Kindly allow me to contribute Wikipedia articles . I request you humbly please unblock me I am not shock of any user . I am new user and now understood what should i do and what I shouldn't I will be grateful to you . Thank You I have also checked here the duck test and read guideline for appealing as well its says The duck test – "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck" – suggests that a person can identify an unknown subject by observing that subject's habitual characteristics.

The duck test does not apply in non-obvious cases. Unless there is such clear and convincing evidence, editors must assume good faith from others. --Rainu2006 (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Rainu2006 (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem unable to decide whether it was your mistake (what was, exactly? Be specific) or whether you're an innocent victim of assumptions of bad faith. Either way, I agree with my colleagues that the behavioural evidence linking you to previous attempts to promote Govind Kumar Singh is strong. Huon (talk) 22:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rainu2006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi see first thing which i want to clear I am notshock or fake account . Second thing I understood my mistake , they way I was editing was not correct , it looks like promotion it was my mistake , I will not do this mistake so I request you please unblock me and allow me to edit other articles . Thank You Rainu2006 (talk) 11:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think on balance of probabilities you are a sock, and in this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rainu2006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me . I will not repeat my mistake I am not sock . Its not fake profile . I will not repeat this mistake Rainu2006 (talk) 13:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per your statements above, you don't seem to grasp WP:DUCK. Furthermore, even if you are not a "shock" account, Wikipedia doesn't need single purpose promotional accounts. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.