User talk:Rai sandeep700

Your draft article, Draft:Khet Singh Khangar

Hello, Rai sandeep700. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khet Singh Khangar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed content from Khangar (community) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 20:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred Criminal Tribe it's a symbol of colonialism and we Indian's are against it. There were around 150 Communities under Criminal Tribe that's why I removed that part. Rai sandeep700 (talk) 20:09, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there's an updated classification, replace it; otherwise, it just looks like deleting information that you don't like. —C.Fred (talk) 20:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred I'll update this article with all references. Rai sandeep700 (talk) 20:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo It's not about the edit war. You should share all the facts . Information is incomplete and ambiguous. You can leave this page as it is. Wiki1985 r (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:48, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]