User talk:Rahul Kumar pandey

Rahul Kumar pandey, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rahul Kumar pandey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Rahul Kumar pandey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Amaravat (state capital) has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Vin09 (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Boyar (caste) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Boyar (caste) was changed by Rahul Kumar pandey (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858029 on 2016-09-13T20:42:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vasireddy Venkatadri Nayudu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Class455 (talk) 22:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Caste titles

Please stop appending generic titles such as Naidu and Thakur to caste names. They are not in common use even among the caste members, except for those really delusioned people who haven't got anything better to do than worry about "puffing up" their origins etc. If you can find reliable sources that mention the terms and are completely independent of the caste(s) then that might be ok but all I have ever seen is passed-on stories in newspapers. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 07:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Naidu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Naidu was changed by Rahul Kumar pandey (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864257 on 2016-09-26T15:30:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kamma (caste), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Sitush (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are repeatedly trying to "puff up" the Kamma (caste) in relation to other castes and it is becoming disruptive. This edit, for example, is not supported by the source and is in any case unnecessary. - Sitush (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And this is unnecessary. The Naidu article is already linked in the body of the Kamma (caste) article and thus should not usually appear in a "See also" section. You can read more about this at WP:See also. - Sitush (talk) 16:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Your recent editing history at Kamma (caste) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 18:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been topic banned for one month from all pages related to castes, broadly construed. Please read WP:TBAN to see what topic banned means.

You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive editing on caste-related pages, ignoring warnings and failing to engage in discussion.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 23:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating your topic ban from pages related to caste, as you did at Kamma (caste). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 14:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why you have been blocked

Rahul Kumar pandey, you were topic banned from all pages related to castes a few days ago, see above. That means you're not allowed to edit caste articles or their talkpages. I understand that you may not know you have a talkpage of your own (this page here), and may not have seen my topic ban notice just above, nor the other warnings you have received, and may not have meant any harm. But I'm afraid there's no other recourse for me now than to block you from editing for a couple of days. If nothing else, I hope the block log will at least help you find this talkpage (I put a link in it). I'm sorry, but it often becomes impossible to edit Wikipedia if you neither read nor use any discussion pages. You simply have to have a way of becoming aware of our rules. Please reply below. Bishonen | talk 14:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]