User talk:Rahma Tamam

Welcome!

Hello, Rahma Tamam, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as American Academy of Air Hospitality, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC) t waiiiiiiit we will save the Article together, I'm so keen on the wikipedia contents, wishing to goin its editing team --Rahma Tamam (talk) 06:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of American Academy of Air Hospitality

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on American Academy of Air Hospitality, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Most of your text was completely unreferenced, and most of the "references" you gave were not references at all, but just links to various university main pages, none of which mentioned the AAAH. Even this didn't, although it's not suitable anyway because it's clearly not an independent third party source as defined in the link above
It's not clear whether the AAAH meets the notability criteria. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, income or profits, but your article is all visions and goals not facts. Even the unreferenced claims in "Numbers to Mention" seem to refer to CIC rather than AAAH
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.

Your article is all Visions, Objectives, Goals and similar, promoting the aims of the AAAH, not facts
An example of unsourced claims presented as fact include: seeks to keep abreast of... link between the high qualifications, intermediate qualifications, the labor market and all segments of society.and similar throughout

it's all about what the company organisation does, little about the company itself other than locations.
the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or proper references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
Your edits indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject, and you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
If you work directly or indirectly for the AAAH or CIC, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rahma Tamam. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rahma Tamam|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
AS I said earlier, before attempting to write an article again, please read this guidance, and remember to reply to the COI question before you do so Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rejoinder Let me add a few words to what Jimfbleak has already said. All articles that you created in the last few days have now been deleted as either copyvio or spam. However, I noted the following similarities between the different articles: 1/ all homepages closely resemble one another, suggesting that they were created by the same company and 2/ all organizations (including the educational institutions and the academic journal) appear to be fake (predatory journal, diploma mill, etc). Continuing to create articles like this will simply result in an indefinite block from editing here. One more article like that and either Jim or I will block you. --Randykitty (talk) 09:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS I only now notice that Jim's request to answer the COI question was posed almost a month ago, not in the last few days. Given that you did not comply with his request but instead started to create a spate of promotional articles, I am going to block you from editing now. --Randykitty (talk) 09:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of York University Hawaii

The article York University Hawaii has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find evidence of notability per WP:CORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 14:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC) thanks discospinster, would you please check for my updates, and direct me if there is something I missed--Rahma Tamam (talk) 19:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Swedish Journal of Scientific Research SJSR

The article The Swedish Journal of Scientific Research SJSR has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, likely predatory "open access" journal.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 19:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Accreditation of Sport Education

The article International Accreditation of Sport Education has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no indication that this association is notable or legitimate. Google search for "International Accreditation of Sport Education" brings up 34 "unique" results, none of them significant coverage in independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 19:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Swedish Journal of Scientific Research SJSR

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Swedish Journal of Scientific Research SJSR, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 04:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Accreditation of Sport Education

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Accreditation of Sport Education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=ooops sorry for that all miss, which happened without intention, I'm trying to contribute by editing articles, but it seems that I need to practice edition for Wikipedia before get any article publish, then I'll care more bout rules, while publishing my previous articles I re-edited them but my internet provider had technical troubles, so I couldn't continue editing the articles and I missed these notes of blocking my Wiki account. So, now I'm here to build an encyclopedia, thanks in advance, --Rahma Tamam (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC) }}

. @Randykitty:Randykitty (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]