User talk:Raheeiejaz907

Welcome

Hello Raheeiejaz907 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

False edit summaries - Credible & Authentic Sources Have Been Cited

If you persist in giving blatantly false edit summaries such as this [1] your editing history on Wikipedia is unlikely to be a long one. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was narrated by various news agencies, biggest ones, around the globe that he was killed, rather than a death by accident. here are few sources:

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/pak-army-commander-killed-baloch-rebels-suspected-101659410237578.html

https://www.indianarrative.com/world-news/baloch-insurgents-claim-responsibility-for-downing-helicopter-that-killed-a-top-pakistani-military-commander-38603.html

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/pakistan-insurgents-claim-downing-army-helicopter-killing-six-2022-08-03/

These are three news sources and you can see their credibility, none of them is small lesser known news agency. This gave rise to the public narrative building that, instead of an accident, this might be a murder. This led to a crack down on people over social media who were discussing this issue. Here is the source for this:

https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/pak-pm-shehbaz-sharif-condemns-social-media-campaigns-against-six-officers-killed-in-chopper-crash/articleshow/93410772.cms

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/pak-pm-shehbaz-sharif-condemns-social-media-campaigns-against-six-officers-killed-in-chopper-crash/articleshow/93410772.cms

Here is even a largest Pakistani independent blog site where people were discussing the same thing:

https://www.siasat.pk/threads/why-was-lt-general-sarfraz-ali-killed-or-died-in-an-accident.843544/ Raheeiejaz907 (talk) 20:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of that even in the slightest justifies your blatantly false edit summary. Or your more recent edit, which again misrepresents what the source cited actually says. I'd strongly advise you to read Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and then discuss this on the article talk page before proceeding further. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Hello, Raheeiejaz907,

You need to have a very good reason to move pages around on Wikipedia and there is no good reason for you to move User pages for another editor. Please do not do this again as it can cause them to be deleted. If you have questions about page moves or editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Raheeiejaz907, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

SilkTork (talk) 12:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]