User talk:Ragebe

Welcome!

Hello, Ragebe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Isle of Wight

I thought you should be aware that the recent edit you made to the Isle of Wight article is in no way 'minor'. Please see WP:MINOR for details on what constitutes a minor edit, and what to do if you accidentally mark a minor edit as major. I also note, on inspection of the article's edit history, that you have inserted this material before and it was removed by another editor. If you genuinely think this material should be in the article, please go to the relevant discussion on the article's talk page. I agree that reverting as POV may have seemed harsh, but please remember that WikiPedia is built by consensus and simply re-inserting text without discussing the change is not a good way to start building your case.

I have reverted your edit. Please go to the Talk Page to discuss. If you are wondering why you have received this message, please also drop me a message. Thank you. --Peeky44 (talk) 12:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additional: The revert was actually made by User:NeilTarrant about a minute before I would have done. Once again, please enter the discussion on the relevant discussion on the article's talk page. --Peeky44 (talk) 12:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

November 2008

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. I noticed that many of your edits do not include an Edit summary .
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you.

While having edits reverted is annoying, the way to get around this is discussion, not just re-instating material.--Peeky44 (talk) 12:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of Doctor Who serials, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Aside from your edits being far from minor, if you had taken time to refer to the talk page you would see that early seasons of Doctor Who are commonly referred as seasons, so agreed consensus is that is the term that should be applied. magnius (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Ragebe/sandbox (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ragebe/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HSL 102 (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still needs any additional amount of information and sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HSL 102 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HSL 102

Hello, Ragebe. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "HSL 102".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]