User talk:Ragaman7

Total Recut

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Total Recut, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.totalrecut.com/totalrecutaboutus.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 10:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Total Recut

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Total Recut. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.totalrecut.com/totalrecutaboutus.php in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Total Recut with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Total Recut with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. WebHamster 10:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Total Recut has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn 20:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Total Recut - Video Remix Community

A tag has been placed on Total Recut - Video Remix Community requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Total Recut

A tag has been placed on Total Recut requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 15:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide evidence of what you are saying. I have moved your comments to a more appropriate place on my talk page- please reply there. J Milburn (talk) 18:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the subject does appear to be notable. Feel free to rewrite the article- remember to cite your sources, ensure the sources are reliable, and remember to write from the neutral point of view. Perhaps it would be best to work on the article in a sandbox (such as User:Ragaman7/Total Recut) so that it is moved into the mainspace only when 'ready'. Feel free to drop me a line if you need a hand or would like me to have a read through the article. J Milburn (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right, the article has a few issues. I'm happy to clean it up a little for you before moving it into the mainspace, but I haven't the time right now, sorry. I will clean it a little later tonight, or tomorrow evening at the very latest. Take a quick read of WP:CITE to give you an idea of how to cite sources, then cite a few in the way reccomended there- that would be a good way to improve the article now. J Milburn (talk) 19:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have given it a cleanup, and moved it to the article space. It's not a bad little article, it has potential! Thanks for your contributions, and feel free to contact me if I can be of any help with this article or any others. J Milburn (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Total Recut

An editor has nominated Total Recut, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Recut and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:AfD nomination

Thanks for letting me know. The procedure now is that we comment on the debate page- in this case, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Recut. The debate stays open for five days (usually) and editors offer their opinions during that time. After that, an administrator judges what the community consensus is- it is not a vote, it is about who has the best arguments. I will head over there and offer my opinions now, then you can offer yours, using the same basic format. J Milburn (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added my arguments for keeping the article, and you are welcome to do so too, but remember mention that you are the author, sign your comments and format it in the same way as me- *'''[Delete/keep]''' [reasoning] ~~~~. J Milburn (talk) 19:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]