User talk:RafizadehTO100P

This is RafizadehTO100P's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earth’s two versions (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Earth’s two versions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Earth’s two versions, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RafizadehTO100P! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...Good morning. I am RafizadehTO100P and have two questions. 1) I have submitted two articles, but can only see one. How can I see both? 2) The article that I am currently seeing is in Sandbox. How do I clear and reset the Sandbox so I can work on another article?

RafizadehTO100P (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's a sandbox at User:RafizadehTO100P/sandbox and a draft at Draft:Earth’s two versions. Special:MyContributions will show all of your contributions, with different filters to look at pages created, recent edits, etc. If you want to create a new page, you're welcome to use the Article wizard to create a draft, or feel free to create a second sandbox. If you go to User:RafizadehTO100P/sandbox 2, it's currently a redlinked/nonexistent page, but you can create it there (or any name that you put in [[square brackets]]. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than create sandboxes, I recommend a Help:userspace draft when you're trying to start a new article. This gives the draft a more useful name than "sandbox". Use sandboxes for experimentation and such; use drafts for drafts. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at your sandbox again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FRINGE

In looking at your two drafts, my impression is that you are writing about topics that mainstream science would consider fringe, for which there are some policies at FRINGE that you may want to make yourself aware of. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earth’s two versions (January 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by ToBeFree was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a publisher of Fringe theories and original research. Wikipedia is a tertiary source that summarizes what reliable secondary sources say about a topic. To challenge this decision, you need to prove that the term "Two versions of earth" is more than a neologism and science-fiction novel topic.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest in references

In the drafts you are preparing, the name of one of the authors of a book you are citing is strongly suggestive that you are citing your own work. This represents a sort of conflict of interest that you should at least declare on your user page. Adding references to your own work on Wikipedia is often taken as a sign of promotionalism or REFSPAM. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear jmcgnh, thanks for guidance and insightful comments. The submitted articles are not fringe as evidenced by references. They represent the mainstream view of theories of Earth’s glacial and interglacial conditions. Current Wikipedia articles on glacial and interglacial Earth lack comprehensive and coherent coverage of Earth’s glacial and interglacial conditions. The submitted articles remove that deficiency and provide a compact, comprehensive and encyclopedic view of Earth’s glacial and interglacial conditions based on the latest available information. There is no conflict of interest as my work is a small part of the knowledge base of Earth’s glacial and interglacial conditions. Best. RafizadehTO100P (talk) 20:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from ToBeFree

Hello, RafizadehTO100P. You have new messages at ToBeFree's talk page.
Message added 20:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion done

Hi RafizadehTO100P,

As requested, the pages have been deleted. To restore them, you can always ask at WP:REFUND.

Feel free to remove this message; feel free to remove any messages you like to remove from this page. You may always do so.

If there are any questions left, feel free to ask for independent advice at the Teahouse, or on my talk page.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]