User talk:Rafax

Welcome!

Hello, Rafax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AdamBiswanger1 01:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rafax. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tergiversando

Tu utilización de las fuentes es intolerable. Ya van tres Wikipedia, según me consta, en las que estás tergiversando lo que dicen las fuentes para hacerlas decir lo que te place. Si seguís por esta senda, te voy a denunciar en Meta. Ferbr1 (talk) 18:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Qué desagradable es todo esto. Las fuentes que añadí dicen explícitamente que el choripán ha sido inventado en Argentina, y son fuentes fiables. No sé si fue un caso agudo de "que inventen ellos" o lo que sea, pero las fuentes dicen eso. No me obliges a tener que volver a dirigirme a tu persona. Ferbr1 (talk) 10:22, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

En Wikipedia, lo que digan las fuentes va a misa. ¿Acaso no lo sabías? Ferbr1 (talk) 12:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC) PD) aparte de insultos, mentiras y foreos, ¿aportarás algo más?[reply]

Le acabo de pegar una ojeada a las referencias que añadiste en la página de discusión de choripán, y veo que seguís con la costumbre de hacerlas decir lo que no dicen. Surrealista, por ejemplo, que "this is an ancestral meal eaten by the Roman empire" le encajes esto. ¿No te da vergüenza?

Intentá ver qué hacés con "In Spain, without the hability of a diglossic society", porque la diglosia no es ninguna "habilidad", ¿eh? además, España sí que es una sociedad diglósica, y desde varios sentidos de esa palabra (informate, ¿eh? que el saber no ocupa lugar...). Por último, comentarte que deberías "reconsiderar" la pertinencia de añadir como referencia a la afirmación anterior esto, porque, como es tu costumbre, en ningún lado del texto se dice para nada que en España no se tiene la habilidad [sic] de la diglosia (lo cual es lógico: un profesional no afirmaría semejante boutade).

En fin, me aburrí. Es una pérdida de tiempo atroz que opongas a fuentes que dicen expresamente que el choripán se inventó en Argentina, otras fuentes que ni afirman lo contrario, ni afirman lo que pretendés que afirman. Qué gratis te está saliendo todo esto, ¿eh? Ferbr1 (talk) 02:28, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seguro...

Claro que sí, hombre, será por eso. ¿Y si mejor borramos cualquier mención al producto que se atrevieron a hacer los sudamericanos? Ferbr1 (talk) 20:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're being discussed by administrators

See WP:ANI#Cross-Wiki sabotage. It has also been claimed that you are abusing multiple accounts on the Spanish Wikipedia. You may add your own comment in the ANI discussion if you wish. I notice that es:Usuario:Vitamine has been blocked for 4 weeks on es.wiki so perhaps there is something behind this complaint. EdJohnston (talk) 18:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deporte/Sport

Dear "Rafax":

You may be right concerning the reference about the origin of the word "sport" (as explained in the link http://www.psicologia-online.com/ebooks/deporte/deporte.shtml) Nevertheless, at the end of the XIX century and until the middle of the XX century most newspapers published in Spanish used the word "sport" (in the original English) instead of the word "deporte" (in Spanish?). The word "deporte" in the dictionary of the Real Academia Española refers to "deportar" and, in "deportar", mentions that comes from the latin word "deportāre". Originally, that mention in the RAE dictionary was included after the French ancient word "desport" and, then, after the corresponding investigation went as far back to the latin word "deportāre". So, are we revisionists, or what?--Estaurofila (talk) 17:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rafax. You have new messages at Philosopher's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]