User talk:Radzee
Radzee, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi Radzee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Nomination of Reekrit Serai for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reekrit Serai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reekrit Serai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Your obvious conflict of interest
[edit]A little digging shows that you have a conflict of interest. So far, all you have done here at Wikipedia is promote rumourbooks.com and its authors. I also suspect that you were operating the following account, which I have blocked:
- Rumourbooks (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Please read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Then, I strongly encourage you to help build the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a medium for free advertising. Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Using Wikipedia to promote your interests
[edit]I've deleted your AfC for Reekrit Serai. Please stop promoting your associates. If you persist in doing this, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)